[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Depends on what the actual members in question did really doesn't it. I don't want to go into the behind the scenes stuff so will use a real life way tyo try and explain that decision I believe you are a teacher or work with kids? So this example should make sense, if I write it right

A, B, C, D and E are a group of friends. The group of friends decide to pick on F. A is abusive towards F over a period of time, culminating in A physically attacking F. B, C, D and E will lightly taunt occasionally, or maybe encourage A to be nasty. Would it be fair to punish all members of the group in exactly the same way? All should be punished for their parts, yes. But IMO, A deserves a harsher punishment.

The analogy is not perfect, or even entirely representative as I don't really want to drag it all up again. Just trying to explain why some bans are longer than others

I'm not a teacher Vicky ,just a teachers assistant at a special needs school,so yes I work with kids and I do see what you are saying there, but I still think some bans should have stayed in place but didn't, I suppose we all have different ideas of what is acceptable and what is not.