Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
It'll be a cycle that continues for the rest of his life, it would be good if they could issue him with a life sentence but changing the law for the sake of one case is never a good idea. The best we can hope for is that he doesn't end up hurting anyone else in the process.
Human Rights should always be protected and they are an absolute, Human Rights for all citizens in the UK or none at all, it doesn't work when you pick or choose who gets them. If anyone is concerned about Human Rights issues in this casethen it's not out of concern for Venebles but more likely for the rights themselves. We live in an age where people often are quick to want to throw away their rights out of fear or a sense of malice which in itself is incredibly silly and an insult to the people who have died to preserve the rights we have.
Just reading about places where Human Rights are not in effect should make people more grateful for what we have and make them want to protect what we have.
|
I understand the Human Rights Act.I also know that people who work in the legal area of the Human Rights Act
in this country do it mostly for the money, not for altruistic reasons.
In my opinion, we shouldn't be worrying about the human rights of people who have acted inhumanely. There are plenty of people in the world who haven't murdered a child, for whom human rights is a happy dream. They're the ones I'd be more interested in protecting.