| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
As it wouldn't be a source of income, the way it'd work would be "this part of the website isn't getting as many clicks as that part of the website, so we're going to dedicate fewer resources to this." Public money is being spent, so the money is spent on what the public uses more often.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
.
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() BBCAN: Erica | Will | Veronica | Johnny | Alejandra | Ryan | Paras |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
.
|
No not at all :/ I'm suggesting prejudice exists in some people and could affect views and clicks (as we were discussing that as being something that could explain the pay divide). I think it's reasonable to assume that could be a factor? I'm not in any way suggesting that it's a valid reason to pay them differently though.
__________________
![]() BBCAN: Erica | Will | Veronica | Johnny | Alejandra | Ryan | Paras |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|