[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Calling me naive when I asked you for evidence of your claims was what I was referring to. If you called me naive and then offered up something of substance to justify it then I wouldn't have cared but you just called me that to cover for the fact that you are making up your argument as you go along.

I don't see how what I said undermines my request for evidence of your claims. I think you've just latched onto that word and tried to turn the argument against me by bringing up evidence in an out of context way that doesn't really make much sense.

Calling you naive is no more attacking, probably a lot less so, than you calling me a racist as you have on many occasions. The rest is nonsense in my opinion.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Calling you naive is no more attacking, probably a lot less so, than you calling me a racist as you have on many occasions. The rest is nonsense in my opinion.

If I call you a racist, I'm going to back it up with things you've said, like I said in the post you quoted but obviously didn't read. I wouldn't have considered naive an attack if you actually bothered to qualify it. Also, stop with trying to turn the word racist or accusations of racism into a dirty word, it's not going to happen no matter how hard you try to make it so.