FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19-03-2018, 05:25 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Ref: BBCnewsHD and SkyNewsHD.
had to happen..... https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-arizona-tempe she later died in hospital. http://myfox8.com/2018/03/19/woman-h...-driving-uber/ Last edited by arista; 19-03-2018 at 05:29 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:45 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
That’s the thing about self drive cars.The testing phase is dangerous.How many people have to die before its perfected.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:45 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Not Ant testing uber cars as a sideline?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:46 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
AI bye bye
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:47 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:54 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:56 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Doesn't look like it's even nearly a thing... all the scaremongering at lorry drivers that in 5yrs they'll have to retrain or be out of a job?.... no chance!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 05:59 PM | #8 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 06:01 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Thank Christ for that. Driverless cars - men self-identifying as women - one big car-crash after another!
Last edited by Brillopad; 19-03-2018 at 06:03 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 06:33 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
Who will be charged for this?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 08:44 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Actually that a fair point can it be seen as blameless?...
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 09:08 PM | #12 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 09:25 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 09:45 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
driverless cars are here to stay, they fact that uber messed up in trials is no particular surprise to me, but lots of other manufacturers are actively testing, and they will become common place in the near future
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:01 PM | #15 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:12 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
There actually was a person behind the wheel monitoring the car. If the woman steps out suddenly into traffic then are they really at fault?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:19 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
thesheriff443
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:23 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
Police identified the victim as 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg and said she was walking outside of the crosswalk with a bicycle when she was hit at around 10pm 'The self-driving technology is supposed to detect pedestrians, cyclists and others and prevent crashes.' 'John M Simpson, privacy and technology project director with Consumer Watchdog, said the collision highlighted the need for tighter regulations of the nascent technology.' https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-arizona-tempe
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:38 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 10:50 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
Police said the woman, Elaine Herzberg, had not been using a pedestrian crossing. The self-driving technology is supposed to detect pedestrians, cyclists
__________________
Last edited by Kizzy; 19-03-2018 at 11:03 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-03-2018, 11:41 PM | #21 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
If there was someone behind the wheel for the sake of these "tests" then surely they are there to act to prevent accidents so they are at fault?
Like a driving instructor having a break pedal in case of emergency? Last edited by Marsh.; 19-03-2018 at 11:41 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-03-2018, 12:58 AM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Triumph of the Weird
|
I liked the original idea of having magnets/rails in the road that the cars followed... I don't like autonomous... I think that it's a security risk, especially if those systems run on a network and are hacked into remotely somehow... I like the rail system because at least, a networked/AI-ish system is only one of the variables... a mixed system sounds nice (but the infrastructure would probably be $$$$$$)
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-03-2018, 12:59 AM | #23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
20-03-2018, 08:27 AM | #24 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
A lot of learner drivers believe that they aren't legally responsible for what happens when they're behind the wheel if they don't have a full licence... But that's not the case. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-03-2018, 10:51 AM | #25 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
My comment about an instructors pedal was more of a question tbh. Do the cars not gave safety measures like that to prevent accidents like this? |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|