[Beastie]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Some looby today said Sisco will be the first out "Beacuse hes black" not because hes a boring tw@ that sings out of tune all day ,not because he doesnt wear his hat straight ....no ,because hes black ,same EVERY year

For **** sakeeeeee. Well **** them complainers. GRR. I would not mind if Sisqo is out first. Well, he is allright but there are more entertaining people in there. I suppose he is not the most boring.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by thebeast

For **** sakeeeeee. Well **** them complainers. GRR. I would not mind if Sisqo is out first. Well, he is allright but there are more entertaining people in there. I suppose he is not the most boring.

Exactly !! you are not allowed to dislike someone if they happen to be black ,according to the do-gooders ,sad isnt it ?

[Gavin]

Ok beast... Here's one of my complaints to Ofcom during BB10. I was livid back then:

To Ofcom,

I am sending you another complaint regarding Channel 4’s Big Brother.

I feel that the editing of the show has been completely manipulated in such a huge manner, that the viewing public and voters are being lied to, suggesting a breach of broadcasting regulations.

On the Big Brother live feed on Sunday 5th July at 00:41am, there was a conversation between the housemates Lisa, Karly and Dogface about nominations. The trio were clearly talking about nominations in code (including the covering of her face from Lisa), which is in breach of the fundamental Big Brother rule stating: “It is not permitted to discuss nominations, or try to influence anyone else’s nominations.”

If Big Brother had acted accordingly to the rules, the trio would have been punished. This punishment has altered in the past, but has frequently been the exclusion of nominations from housemates involved with such a breach.

However, in the transmission of the episode on Sunday evening, the conversation was completely missed out by the editors. This is a serious violation of the rules regarding “fair editing” of the show.

As a result of not showing this conversation, the housemates were not shown breaking the rules and Big Brother took no action. This is a blatant cover up to the public and the voters.

Therefore, the competition rules have been infringed by the editors as viewers are told to vote to evict people who perhaps should not be up for the vote if the appro[riate action was taken from Big Brother.

This is a clear breach of regulations (as I have said previously), and I hope you can investigate this fully as otherwise voters are spending money on a competition which is unfair and heavily biased.

I hope that the matter can conclude in a way whereby the appropriate companies including Channel 4, Brighter Pictures and Endemol, are fined for their lies.

I hope to receive a reply soon,

Gavin

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Gavin

Ok beast... Here's one of my complaints to Ofcom during BB10. I was livid back then:

To Ofcom,

I am sending you another complaint regarding Channel 4’s Big Brother.

I feel that the editing of the show has been completely manipulated in such a huge manner, that the viewing public and voters are being lied to, suggesting a breach of broadcasting regulations.

On the Big Brother live feed on Sunday 5th July at 00:41am, there was a conversation between the housemates Lisa, Karly and Dogface about nominations. The trio were clearly talking about nominations in code (including the covering of her face from Lisa), which is in breach of the fundamental Big Brother rule stating: “It is not permitted to discuss nominations, or try to influence anyone else’s nominations.”

If Big Brother had acted accordingly to the rules, the trio would have been punished. This punishment has altered in the past, but has frequently been the exclusion of nominations from housemates involved with such a breach.

However, in the transmission of the episode on Sunday evening, the conversation was completely missed out by the editors. This is a serious violation of the rules regarding “fair editing” of the show.

As a result of not showing this conversation, the housemates were not shown breaking the rules and Big Brother took no action. This is a blatant cover up to the public and the voters.

Therefore, the competition rules have been infringed by the editors as viewers are told to vote to evict people who perhaps should not be up for the vote if the appro[riate action was taken from Big Brother.

This is a clear breach of regulations (as I have said previously), and I hope you can investigate this fully as otherwise voters are spending money on a competition which is unfair and heavily biased.

I hope that the matter can conclude in a way whereby the appropriate companies including Channel 4, Brighter Pictures and Endemol, are fined for their lies.

I hope to receive a reply soon,

Gavin

PMSL

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Gavin

Ok beast... Here's one of my complaints to Ofcom during BB10. I was livid back then:

To Ofcom,

I am sending you another complaint regarding Channel 4’s Big Brother.

I feel that the editing of the show has been completely manipulated in such a huge manner, that the viewing public and voters are being lied to, suggesting a breach of broadcasting regulations.

On the Big Brother live feed on Sunday 5th July at 00:41am, there was a conversation between the housemates Lisa, Karly and Dogface about nominations. The trio were clearly talking about nominations in code (including the covering of her face from Lisa), which is in breach of the fundamental Big Brother rule stating: “It is not permitted to discuss nominations, or try to influence anyone else’s nominations.”

If Big Brother had acted accordingly to the rules, the trio would have been punished. This punishment has altered in the past, but has frequently been the exclusion of nominations from housemates involved with such a breach.

However, in the transmission of the episode on Sunday evening, the conversation was completely missed out by the editors. This is a serious violation of the rules regarding “fair editing” of the show.

As a result of not showing this conversation, the housemates were not shown breaking the rules and Big Brother took no action. This is a blatant cover up to the public and the voters.

Therefore, the competition rules have been infringed by the editors as viewers are told to vote to evict people who perhaps should not be up for the vote if the appro[riate action was taken from Big Brother.

This is a clear breach of regulations (as I have said previously), and I hope you can investigate this fully as otherwise voters are spending money on a competition which is unfair and heavily biased.

I hope that the matter can conclude in a way whereby the appropriate companies including Channel 4, Brighter Pictures and Endemol, are fined for their lies.

I hope to receive a reply soon,

Gavin

Thanks for this! Yeah I remember someone on here during bb10 said they were talking about nominations on live feed but never got punished. They bloody should have, put them 3 up with 2 of them going......

Too late now though.

[FaLaLaLand]

As for Gavin, what a plonker. If you complain about reality TV then you're unhappy with life and the world in general, as it is an accurate representation.

The mouse trap task was NOT dangerous - the mouse traps didn't have spikes under them so it was basically a spring-loaded metal bar which would cause a slight "slam" to his finger if he had not of moved it away.

[Gavin]

Originally Posted by Jonnii

As for Gavin, what a plonker. If you complain about reality TV then you're unhappy with life and the world in general, as it is an accurate representation.

The mouse trap task was NOT dangerous - the mouse traps didn't have spikes under them so it was basically a spring-loaded metal bar which would cause a slight "slam" to his finger if he had not of moved it away.

I do have a life. And I am entitled to complain to Ofcom when I see fit to do so.

The mouse trap was a massive safety hazard. Stephen could have had his figner caught in one of them and it would have caused severe damage to his metacarpals.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Gavin

I do have a life. And I am entitled to complain to Ofcom when I see fit to do so.

The mouse trap was a massive safety hazard. Stephen could have had his figner caught in one of them and it would have caused severe damage to his metacarpals.

[FaLaLaLand]

Originally Posted by Gavin

I do have a life. And I am entitled to complain to Ofcom when I see fit to do so.

The mouse trap was a massive safety hazard. Stephen could have had his figner caught in one of them and it would have caused severe damage to his metacarpals.

Just to clarify I didn't say you didn't have a life so don't play victim.

Secondly, no. I work in a general store and have to deal with mousetraps in the back of the building and even when I've trapped my finger in them they do NOT hurt at all, they're very easy to prize off in fact. Just that a mouse's body is very soft and could crush them with the sheer force of the spring.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Gavin

I do have a life. And I am entitled to complain to Ofcom when I see fit to do so.

The mouse trap was a massive safety hazard. Stephen could have had his figner caught in one of them and it would have caused severe damage to his metacarpals.

It would have been a God send if he had trapped his pi$$ing tongue in it !!

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Gavin

I do have a life. And I am entitled to complain to Ofcom when I see fit to do so.

The mouse trap was a massive safety hazard. Stephen could have had his figner caught in one of them and it would have caused severe damage to his metacarpals.

I think it is about time we had Mario back onto BB. The health and safety monitor

But yeah I agree with you Gavin, I bet them mouse traps hurt! I think Stephen should have been given a pair of safety gloves

[RealityTVisGreat]

Please bear in mind that many friends, relatives etc are at this moment fighting and dying against the Taliban
There people would not dare to express any opinion against the muslim beliefs, this is Britain a democratic country where people can and do express their opinions, right or wrong!

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by RealityTVisGreat

Please bear in mind that many friends, relatives etc are at this moment fighting and dying against the Taliban
There people would not dare to express any opinion against the muslim beliefs, this is Britain a democratic country where people can and do express their opinions, right or wrong!

My nephew has just come back from his second tour ,lost 2 best mates this time

[RealityTVisGreat]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

My nephew has just come back from his second tour ,lost 2 best mates this time

I know a lot of people out there and who have come back, but it needs to be done, alas!
Although soldiers dying is a terrible thing!

[arista]

Bible Freak Nutters

One day they will all be in America
they love em.

[Gavin]

Originally Posted by arista

Bible Freak Nutters

One day they will all be in America
they love em.

Stop labelling Christians as "bible freaks". That's so rude!

You do realise that over 70% of our population are Christian, so you're inferring that 70% of Brits are "bible freaks".

No, actually you're the freak

[Tom]

Gavin you're not even funny anymore, novelty has worn off

[MusicMan]

I'm finding Gavin quite funny from the short time I've been on this forum... Gavin are you for real?

[Gavin]

Originally Posted by MusicMan

I'm finding Gavin quite funny from the short time I've been on this forum... Gavin are you for real?

Of course I'm for real. I don't want to be funny... I'm just stating the truth.

Stephen was in huge risk during that task. I was so scared that he would be in danger, that I looked away for that 1 minute duration. It was too much for me!

[MusicMan]

Originally Posted by Gavin

Of course I'm for real. I don't want to be funny... I'm just stating the truth.

Stephen was in huge risk during that task. I was so scared that he would be in danger, that I looked away for that 1 minute duration. It was too much for me!

Oh fair enough, it just seemed like someone taking the mick!
I apologise if you are actually for real
But not if you're not

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by MusicMan

Oh fair enough, it just seemed like someone taking the mick!
I apologise if you are actually for real
But not if you're not

Hes winding you up

[MusicMan]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Hes winding you up

I'm so confused lol!!

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by MusicMan

I'm finding Gavin quite funny from the short time I've been on this forum... Gavin are you for real?

Of course he's not!

[Dr. Pierre Chang]

I'd have told Baldwin to shut the **** up if he was spouting that prayer while I was waiting to eat. Fair enough if you are deeply religious but don't ram it down everyones throats !

Dr. Pierre Chang.

[MusicMan]

Originally Posted by Dr. Pierre Chang

I'd have told Baldwin to shut the **** up if he was spouting that prayer while I was waiting to eat. Fair enough if you are deeply religious but don't ram it down everyones throats !

Dr. Pierre Chang.

Agreed