FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 | |||
|
||||
Hands off my Brick!
|
I agree, alcohol tends to make people far more violent and aggressive but you always hear people say "Oh, he must have been on something"! eh no he was drunk.........
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
I do love that happy little world.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Rehabilitation is what drug addicts need, not locking up. Some people are beyond help, in which case the NHS should start withdrawing funding for drug related illnesses.
Locking them up will lead to increases in incarcerated suicide and if the prisons will help them then it defeats the object of the help, because it could be done willingly in a hospital environment and not forcefully in a prison environment. There would be a higher liklihood of a relapse in a prison environment because people would have the mentality to get clean so they can get out. If people don't want the help its up to them, its their health they're damaging but linking back to the start of the post, if thats the case then that person shouldn't be allowed treatment for drug related illnesses on the NHS. Last edited by Tom.; 23-03-2011 at 03:30 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
The prison system is awash with drugs anyway. It's like sending a wino to a speakeasy.
Drugs should be treated as purely a health matter. Not a judicial one. If someone on drugs commits an act that infringes on the rights of others then yes, the act itself should be treated as a criminal matter. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
your logic is all screwed up on reasons for re offending rates the reason the more hardline prisoners have a higher re offending rate is not because they served sentence in the "harsher regime" it is because they are more hardline criminals! that is why they are there in the first place the ones with low re offending rates taking part in community service are the lower level criminals so naturally there is a much greater chance they will not repeat offend once they are released to lower the re offending rate, hardline criminals should be given much longer sentences and prison be made more punishing (no violence and torture as you exaggerated) if they are in prison for longer, which they should be anyway, they cannot commit crimes can they if the prison is a hellhole then they are much less likely to re offend as they will not want to go back ever and the threat of going to a hellhole prison will lower crime rates |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
But it isn't necessarily a conscience decision whether you'll reoffend or not. Some people are just predispositioned to crime.
Last edited by Tom.; 23-03-2011 at 05:56 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
All prisons have different regimes, practically no two prisons are run the same, nor do they have the same facilities. Classes, rehabilitation & work courses and facilities all vary. I mentioned community work not community service I also used the term rehabilitation education, you know seeing crime from the victims point of view, anger management etc. The categories of prisons have more to do with security measures imposed not about the regime inside a prison. Hardline prisoners who were guilty of serious crimes like murder etc are often released under a condition called life license. If they offend again they go back in. What violence and torture did I exaggerate? Prisoners can and do commit crimes in prison. Incidentally its not my logic on re offending rates its the Ministry of Justice's own figures not mine. I didnt post them on their site. Last edited by Shasown; 23-03-2011 at 06:25 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
i dont need to go to the website as you have already stated what the figures say. I am not arguing if the figures are true or not you said that on the website figures show that criminals who spend their time under harsh regime have a higher re offending rate correct? I am saying the reason the re offending rate is higher is because they are hardline criminals, not because they were prisoners under a harsh regime of the prison. why do you keep being an arrogant prick and be insulting looking down your nose as you argue with somone calling them ignorant and such you sound like a right snob Last edited by Grimnir; 23-03-2011 at 07:17 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
It doesnt say they are hardline criminals it states what sort of regime has what sort of results. Harsher regimes have higher reoffending rates. As I said maybe you should educate yourself on the situation first before making incorrect statements. Saves looking stupid. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |||
|
||||
User tanned
|
Quote:
Of course its a conscious decision. They know it's wrong and they choose to proceed. They don't commit crime in a subconscious state! |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The prisoners in a tough prison have higher reoffending rates. We got prisoners, tough prison and higher reoffending rates, right understand? Lets break it down simply like alphabet for you in case you a bit slow You are saying B causes C I am saying A causes C They dont reoffend because they have been in a tough prison, you seriously think that? They reoffend because they are criminals scum and have no respect for other people do you need a diagram and legend to know what A B and C stand for? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
Could you provide some evidence for that? Any at all, nope thought not. Or is it just what your miniscule brain tells you should be so. You need to get a grip on reality me old fruit. Just because you say it is so doesnt make it so. Last edited by Shasown; 23-03-2011 at 11:14 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I didn't mean it in that sense, I meant that when a lot of criminals commit crime, they do it because they think its right or they think they'll get away with it. They think they'll be able to get away with it or justify it, and so won't be going to prison for it.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
I think that you get the justice you can afford. In the early 90s, Ernest Saunders, former chairman of the Guinness Group, was released early from prison on compassionate grounds on account that he was suffering from Alzheimer's disease. Soon after being released he made a full recovery - the first person in the history of the world ever to make a recovery from Alzheimer's. Of course, despite his doctors pleading his Alzheimer's case back then, with copious amounts of "evidence", he now says he was suffering from depression and not Alzheimer's.
Does anyone believe that a working-class Joe Schmoe would be released early from a 30 month sentence because he was suffering from anything? Money talks, and nowhere does it speak louder than in the courts of justice. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
evidence for what? my opinion that serious offenders and hardline type criminals will have higher reoffending rates because they dont give a toss about other people and society and consequences? you need to accept other people's opinions, you are supposed to be the loony lefty fruity pie |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
If you two don't pack it in, I'm going to knock your heads together.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |||
|
||||
User tanned
|
The only really proven way to stop hardcore criminals from re-offending is to lock them away for longer. Which spares numerous victims and destroyed lives.
We need more prisons and longer sentences. No, its not the perfect solution and costs money but its certainly effective in physically preventing criminals committing more crime. Like I said, more emphasis needs to be put on locking up the ones who are a physical threat to others. They are a menace to society and ruin lives. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|