[Cherie]

Luv Ya Pyramid...Keep shapely...

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by CherieB

Luv Ya Pyramid...Keep shapely...

Luvs you too.


us Lord Devotees are sharing the luvs.

Jem couldn't face the eviction crowd....what a wet rag - all mouth but no bottle. Boot. (her...not you !! )

[King Gizzard]

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth

Wow! This show is turning into a joke.

You catched on quick

[Benjamin]

It also means only 5 in the final unless they replace Jem. It's late in the season but they have always replaced a housemate that walks and Kinga came in the week before the final as a replacement in BB6.

[rk3388]

Double eviction - Aaron vs Harry

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

Jem walked, so her boyfriends noms were discounted.

Making it

Arron 4
Harry 2
Jay 2
Faye 2

Is this normal when someone has walked? That their nominations made in the house are discounted?

Were Marks? (He did nom before he went right..? can't remember for sure)

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by vesavius

Is this normal when someone has walked? That their nominations made in the house are discounted?

Were Marks? (He did nom before he went right..? can't remember for sure)

I dont think its happened before. But Marks might have been discounted...even if they were it wouldnt have changed who was up that week so we may not have been told.

However its also never happened before that when a housemate involved in a head to head eviction walks...the next person with the highest vote gets put up either. You would think the whole thing would just be cancelled but they clearly still want vote money this week

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I dont think its happened before. But Marks might have been discounted...even if they were it wouldnt have changed who was up that week so we may not have been told.

However its also never happened before that when a housemate involved in a head to head eviction walks...the next person with the highest vote gets put up either. You would think the whole thing would just be cancelled but they clearly still want vote money this week

But we don't know about Marks?

I would be interested though to find out... it would tell me if this move to put all four of them up was intentioned to protect Aaron and Harry.

(because I do not buy into BB hating Aaron or any other HM... I buy into BB doing whatever is required at any given time to make what they want to be a interesting narrative. Sometimes this benefits a HM, sometimes it dosen't, but I don't accept that there is any other agenda or 'chosen ones')

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by vesavius

But we don't know about Marks?

I would be interested though to find out... it would tell me if this move to put all four of them up was intentioned to protect Aaron and Harry.

(because I do not buy into BB hating Aaron or any other HM... I buy into BB doing whatever is required at any given time to make what they want to be a interesting narrative. Sometimes this benefits a HM, sometimes it dosen't, but I don't accept that there is any other agenda or 'chosen ones')

But its not that. As never before when a housemate who has walked during a head to head eviction, has the eviction changed to being the next person with the highest votes either So its certainly not to protect Harry as he wouldnt have even been up in a head to head. The eviction should be cancelled. But they want cash...I think its really that simple

Plus BB told Jem that if she walked it would be the 4 up too...so it wasnt a last minute panic to try and save Harry either(was shown on BBOTS, dunno if you watch that or not)

[Josy]

Originally Posted by vesavius

Is this normal when someone has walked? That their nominations made in the house are discounted?

Were Marks? (He did nom before he went right..? can't remember for sure)

It wasn't normal nominations this week, so it can't really be compared to Mark.

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Josy

It wasn't normal nominations this week, so it can't really be compared to Mark.

Ofc it can, noms are noms.

I have never heard of them discounting a HM's noms when they have walked, thats all.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by vesavius

Ofc it can, noms are noms.

I have never heard of them discounting a HM's noms when they have walked, thats all.

Ever heard of them moving onto the next person with the most because someone has walked? The whole thing has never been done before...usually in this situation the whole eviction would be cancelled.

Anyway, we wont know about Marks...mostly as it would never have changed the result anyway...so there would be no need for them to show his being discounted...

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth

How convenient

And Mark's noms were never discounted when he walked, not that it would have made a difference to Faye & Maisy being up, but his noms still stood. C5 never said otherwise.

So they made up this new rule to save Arron & Harry. Wow! This show is turning into a joke.

But Mark wasn't up for eviction that week. They needed to find a fair way to find out who would be up for eviction alongside Aaron, not that the nominations in the first place were that fair, but there you go...

[michael21]

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth

The votes from the relatives left the housemates with these nominations:

Arron 5
Jem 4
Harry 3
Jay 2
Faye 2

Meaning Jem & Arron were the two with the highest and so they were up.

Now Jem leaves meaning the next two with the highest should be up, Arron & Harry.

But this would mean Aaron or Harry going home, BB doesn't want to lose either so instead they pick everyone with a nom

As far as I know BB have just make up this rubbish to protect Harry & Aaron. What other reasons are there for it not being Aaron & Harry up by themselves?

the more housemate up = more phone vote which = more money

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Ever heard of them moving onto the next person with the most because someone has walked?

Well, that one unprecedented response seems as valid as the next tbh, so that means they chose the option they did for a reason (rather then going with the other unprecendented solution).

This suggests to me they considered both options, neither having been done before, and choose the one that would shield the HMs they wanted shielded. Just my opinion though... But I guess that's all it is from anyone because we don't know.

Originally Posted by Vicky.

usually in this situation the whole eviction would be cancelled.

I do accept that money is always a consideration as well, hence this oprion not being taken.

[StraightEdge695]

i dont see anything wrong with it.. i know aaron would be save either way

[Mystic Mock]

Tbf I think they had to make it up to Aaron and his fans by doing this because it was out of order having housemates family members nominating instead of the housemates who are contracted to nominate.

I personally think they did that twist this week though to protect Louise as they know that some people would try and tactically remove her.

[psychtracker]

Originally Posted by vesavius

(because I do not buy into BB hating Aaron or any other HM... I buy into BB doing whatever is required at any given time to make what they want to be a interesting narrative. Sometimes this benefits a HM, sometimes it dosen't, but I don't accept that there is any other agenda or 'chosen ones')

I partially agree with this, particularly with the conspiracy types saying Jay is a chosen one etc.. I think this is particularly true with putting him up, knowing there's a fair chance he will go. If they were hell bent on having him in the final, they would have left it at Harry vs Aaron, no questions answered!

The first thing i read from C5, after Jem's leaving was anyone who received a nomination vote would now be up for eviction, and it went on to say because Louise, Tom, Alex did not receive any votes, they will not face a public vote. So it seems to me, the subtracting Jem's BF votes was actually an after thought.

[Jords]

Im glad they did this, more fair.

[InOne]

The whole noms "twist" and Jem walking just seems like a set up really. I think Jem had been told what to do from when she went in.

[psychtracker]

Originally Posted by InOne

The whole noms "twist" and Jem walking just seems like a set up really. I think Jem had been told what to do from when she went in.

I don't buy that, i think the reason why she was wanting to walk as long as she did, and never did, was more likely BB was trying to stall her (like they always do), and desperate for her to stay. Coz, the whole issuing of refunds would be a major pain in the ass for them.

[InOne]

Originally Posted by psychtracker

I don't buy that, i think the reason why she was wanting to walk as long as she did, and never did, was more likely BB was trying to stall her (like they always do), and desperate for her to stay. Coz, the whole issuing of refunds would be a major pain in the ass for them.

I doubt dirty Dez needs to think about costs, especially when people are already lapping up refunds

[psychtracker]

Originally Posted by InOne

I doubt dirty Dez needs to think about costs, especially when people are already lapping up refunds

Well tell me why, when ANY housemate says they want to leave, don't they just let em freely walk out the door? Why do you think they ALWAYS have em go through a stalling routine?

[InOne]

Originally Posted by psychtracker

Well tell me why, when ANY housemate says they want to leave, don't they just let em freely walk out the door? Why do you think they ALWAYS have em go through a stalling routine?

But how much of this "stalling routine" have we actually seen? It's so heavily edited with C5 it's hard to know

[jyunga]

Don't forget it's C5s first BB. Not having eviction nights cause of walkers would hurt the ratings some (which they definitely don't need).