[Black Dagger]

If they decided next week once Gina goes they realise they can't lose anymore characters and decide VTS slays I'd die

Alas, it isn't meant to be.

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

Yep...

So get excited for Jack and Joe eating crisp and Sophie making the odd dumb comment xo

dont forget callum doing, errr whatever callum does

[psychtracker]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

Yep...

So get excited for Jack and Joe eating crisp and Sophie making the odd dumb comment xo

Great, ok.
I've been advocating for about the last 10 years, that they should do away with nominations. Have the public do a weekly vote on their Fav housemate, then the 3x with the least votes are nominated. Then a 'vote to save'. That's the best way i can think to prevent a 'Jack and Joe' crisp eating finale! ;-)

[CaudleHalbard]

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

Yes.

[Benjamin]

BB will make more money from vote to evict, so they won't change it back.

[YodaBB]

I prefur vote to save

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

It depends what you class as 'bad behaviour' Conor last year going in a VTE would have been brilliant, somebody having a couple of arguments and trying to keep the series alive, no they deserve to stay, vote to evict is ridiculous and will kill any potential this series has.

[Vladimir]

Originally Posted by Ben

BB will make more money from vote to evict, so they won't change it back.

yeah, but they'll lose viewers when all entertaining housemates leave

[Yayita]

Vote to evict is MUCH MUCH Better!!!

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

It depends what you class as 'bad behaviour' Conor last year going in a VTE would have been brilliant, somebody having a couple of arguments and trying to keep the series alive, no they deserve to stay, vote to evict is ridiculous and will kill any potential this series has.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/big_brother_2013

[Patrick]

I'm actually laughing at people that are defending the vote to evict option - you lot actually contribute nothing, or know nothing about creating a good series.

In reply to the OP - whilst I admire your spunk and fight, campaigns like this are so 2010, they never work anymore. It's not as big a show, and in Channel 5's eyes they really couldn't give two ******s about what we want, as long as Natalie Cassidy is still shining on the health lottery every week, then they're content.

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

lol at people wanting vote to evict, I can't...

One of them being Troy, who's favourites in BB10 were David and Lisa, that in it'self should be why vote to save >>>

[Roy Mars III]

Originally Posted by Vladimir

yeah, but they'll lose viewers when all entertaining housemates leave

Gina isn't entertaining though

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

Gina isn't entertaining though

Not just Gina tho... anybody who does anything of note will go.

[Roy Mars III]

If they bring back Vote To Save it must be a rule that at least 3 people are up at all times, or else it's just the same as Vote to Evict

[flamingGalah!]

Vote to evict is MUCH better...

[Ramsay]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

If they bring back Vote To Save it must be a rule that at least 3 people are up at all times, or else it's just the same as Vote to Evict

That is true

[Lewarse]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

Vote to evict is MUCH better...

Why is it MUCH better? I haven't seen a single good argument for Eviction over vote to Save.

Vote to Save preserves the most compelling housemates. Evict gets rid of them.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

If they decided next week once Gina goes they realise they can't lose anymore characters and decide VTS slays I'd die

Alas, it isn't meant to be.

The odds are getting closer between her and Dexter.

Gina 1/2
Dexter 9/4
Sallie 5/1

If we all voted multiple times to evict Dexter (i.e. more than once) then I think we could actually get him evicted this week and Gina and Sallie would be saved.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Patrick

I'm actually laughing at people that are defending the vote to evict option - you lot actually contribute nothing, or know nothing about creating a good series........................

Well I guess we haven't all got your vast wealth of life experience, Patrick. What are you now... 16?

[fingers]

Vote to evict, it's all the same to Desmond, so long as you pay he's happy.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

lol at people wanting vote to evict, I can't...

One of them being Troy, who's favourites in BB10 were David and Lisa, that in it'self should be why vote to save >>>

If you could point out where I said I want vote to evict, please let me know because all I said was that VTS ultimately didn't make the difference it was expected to make.

And IDK why you're so hung up on my BB10 opinions. Is it that hard to believe not everyone liked Freddie/Marcus/Siavash? BB10 was **** anyways so who cares

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Livia

Well I guess we haven't all got your vast wealth of life experience, Patrick. What are you now... 16?

SHOTS FIRED!!!

[Glenn.]

It's been a vote to save since C5 took over Big Brother. The end result is no different.

Don't get the problem tbh.

[evanshil]

Vote to evict isn't better, all of the entertaining housemates will get evicted and the boring ones will stay