[Calderyon]

She was being an spiteful little idiot.

Hopefully Charlie cuts ties with her altogether.

[Pink Pegasus]

Originally Posted by anon01

Nah, you could tell she genuinely hates her.

I suppose she did sound quite cross.

[aman201]

Originally Posted by MTVN

However you see the whole Hazel-Daley situation, it's still an irrelevant reason to use. The point of nominations is that you're putting people up for eviction based on the last seven days, not to drag up things from three or four weeks ago, plus like a couple of people have said the F&F are meant to be nominating on behalf of their housemate which she obviously wasn't doing

And do housemates only use the last 7 days when nominating?

Of course not.

[Im_Juz_ChiLLin]

i want a fight tonight on Live feed

[Mystic Mock]

Girls like her are a sad state of affairs to this country if she seems to think that Daley is some sort of victim in the whole affair.

Imo both were idiots, but Daley's actions was worse.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by BigBuk

That girl on BOTS wasn't Dexters GF, it was so obvious, she didn't know a thing about him.

... said an "insider".

[Pink Pegasus]

Originally Posted by Im_Juz_ChiLLin

i want a fight tonight on Live feed

I think there is going to be a massive one! Hazel, Gina and Charlie seem like a good bet.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by anon01

And do housemates only use the last 7 days when nominating?

Of course not.

Not only, but they also don't only use things from 3/4 weeks back

The last 7 days is probably what is dominant in their minds when nomming, they might use things from earlier as their reasons but mainly when their behaviour in the last week has backed up that and been consistent with something from a while back

[aman201]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Girls like her are a sad state of affairs to this country if she seems to think that Daley is some sort of victim in the whole affair.

Imo both were idiots, but Daley's actions was worse.

Hazel was disgusting in that whole Daley situation, and she needed to be made aware of that.

Daley was to blame too, but he's not in the house anymore.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

It had nothing to do with Charlie so that nomination reason should not have been allowed.

Why? It's not Charlies nominations.

[alex_front2]

Disagree, Charlie's friend was brilliant. Great nom reasons, hopefully it will leaad to women nominating her out of the house.

[M X]

I thought it was the best reason. Highlight of tonight's show tbh.

[aman201]

Originally Posted by MichaelSpears

I thought it was the best reason. Highlight of tonight's show tbh.

Of course it was.

Hazel fans are SEETHING.

[Jake.]

Pathetic. Using the opportunity to be as spiteful as possible and not even using a relevant reason to nominate her.

[showtime77]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

It had nothing to do with Charlie so that nomination reason should not have been allowed.

Charlie's friend has probably helped save Charlie's butt! Hazel is going to go.

[Shaun]

to be fair Matt I don't think that should necessarily be the case - if a housemate were nominating another because 4 weeks ago that housemate had thrown cereal at them, it would be perfectly valid (although, in that example, other things would have happened since that incident so as to validate the nomination)...

Hmm. Outside nominations should be based around recent events I guess.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by anon01

Of course it was.

Hazel fans are SEETHING.

What a strange thing to be so happy about. I think most Hazel fans just think that Charlie's mate is a ridiculous, short-sighted ****.

[james130]

Originally Posted by BBfan46

She deserved that.


but Hazel should be held accountable.

No woman should ever be held accountable for what results in a man putting his hands round her throat.

[smudgie]

I fully expected Charlie and Hazel getting nominated from each others F/F, but that was harsh I mean rally harsh.

[aman201]

Originally Posted by Livia

What a strange thing to be so happy about. I think most Hazel fans just think that Charlie's mate is a ridiculous, short-sighted ****.

She told it how it is, it was about time Hazel was made aware of her actions.

And plus it makes for more good TV.

Win-win. (unless you're a Hazel fan of course)

[Livia]

Originally Posted by anon01

She told it how it is, it was about time Hazel was made aware of her actions.

And plus it makes for more good TV.

Win-win. (unless you're a Hazel fan of course)

No she didn't "tell it how it is". She just happened to agree with your own views... that's not the same thing, you'll find.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Shaun

to be fair Matt I don't think that should necessarily be the case - if a housemate were nominating another because 4 weeks ago that housemate had thrown cereal at them, it would be perfectly valid (although, in that example, other things would have happened since that incident so as to validate the nomination)...

Hmm. Outside nominations should be based around recent events I guess.

True, I think things like that would generally be more used as an example of a character trait or something though rather than be a whole reason in itself

[Livia]

Originally Posted by james130

No woman should ever be held accountable for what results in a man putting his hands round her throat.

So well said, James.

[smeagol]

it was real nom though rather than going for what she might think charlie would do
though maybe she was as charlie is very sneaky maybe she knows charlie more than us.
as hazel charlie are not real friends

[Amy Jade]

Livia and James in this thread