Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23-03-2015, 11:09 PM #1
bots's Avatar
bots bots is offline
self-oscillating
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 53,427

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


bots bots is offline
self-oscillating
bots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 53,427

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
Have ours gone out of date then?
Its not so much that the warheads have gone out of date, but delivery mechanisms and targetting will always need improving. Thats where the money goes. So the investment is more in those things which are applicable to many missile systems, not just nuclear. We already have more nuclear material than we could ever possibly need, and these days that production is relatively dirt cheap.

If the politicians made this more clear, I think people would find it more acceptable.
bots is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 11:14 PM #2
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Oh god that old we need to update computer systems chestnut then?
Look how inept they were at doing that in the welfare system! for gods sake I hope they don't ask IDS for advice we'll all be dust!
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 24-03-2015, 07:57 PM #3
Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Default

^what Kirk said.
Our country's defence is already depleated.Britain used to have the best navy in the world.In the Falklands in 1982 we apparently had access to 60 warships and frigates,Now we have 19 with only about 7 which will be deployable at one time.Our Army has been cut and will supposedly be down to 50,000 in the next four years.We need a nuclear deterent,Without it we will have hardly any political power on the world stage.Russia is modernising its military why the hell are we cutting ours?
While nuclear weapons exist,We need them.While there is a possiblity countries like Iran have them or are close to having them,We need them.While North Korea have them,We need them.While there is any slight chance a terrorist could possibly make one,We need them.
Our governments number one priority should be the protection and security of the British people.
I certainly don't want to live in a weak defenceless country.
Why should we have to rely on the US and France to defend us?Why not stand on our own two feet and take responsibility for our own defence.Why should other countries have to carry us?

Last edited by Northern Monkey; 24-03-2015 at 08:00 PM.
Northern Monkey is offline  
Old 24-03-2015, 07:58 PM #4
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,777


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,777


Default

She should get rid of them all... the day after everyone else gets rid of theirs.
Livia is offline  
Old 25-03-2015, 12:25 PM #5
billy123 billy123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Out here in the perimeter
Posts: 10,448


billy123 billy123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Out here in the perimeter
Posts: 10,448


Default

Somebody has to take the first step.
Nobody in possession of nuclear weapons is in any position to tell anybody to stop developing their nuclear capabilities.
What right have Britain,America or anybody to throw their arms up in the air in disgust at Iran,North Korea or anybody for that matter for developing nuclear capabilities when we are in possession of enough to wipe any country off the face of the planet.

Keep them and deal with the fact that everybody has the right to own them or get rid of them and gain the right to try and stop the development and ownership of them by anyone.
There are a lot better minds than mine trying to answer the question keep or get rid but it doesn't take a genius to work out that unless somebody makes a brave first move to disarm then nobody will.
I personally hope Britain can disarm and lead the way forward.

Last edited by billy123; 25-03-2015 at 12:30 PM.
billy123 is offline  
Old 25-03-2015, 02:35 PM #6
Jamesy Jamesy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 4,652

Favourites (more):
BB18: Raph
BB16: Nick
Jamesy Jamesy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 4,652

Favourites (more):
BB18: Raph
BB16: Nick
Default

If it would cost billions I would rather see this money pumped into existing defenses, which have received pretty severe cuts under the current government.
Jamesy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
nukes, renew, uk

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts