Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23-03-2015, 05:14 PM #1
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default Should The UK renew its Nukes? or not

Both Conservative and Labour
say they will renew the Weapons based in Scotland
using Billions of tax payers money.


Many do not want them
as they say we no longer need them etc?
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:19 PM #2
MTVN's Avatar
MTVN MTVN is offline
All hail the Moyesiah
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Country
Posts: 59,982

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Lewis G


MTVN MTVN is offline
All hail the Moyesiah
MTVN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Country
Posts: 59,982

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Lewis G


Default

Yes I think so, we should accept that peaceful international relations do rely on a balance of power and our possession of nuclear weapons is a part of that balance, else we leave France as the only western European power who holds them. Of course ideally we'd live in a nuclear free world but you can never be rid of the technology and the knowledge that gave birth to them, and even if you could convince every present government to give up their weapons - which would not happen anyway - we can never know what the next generation of leaders will do
MTVN is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:38 PM #3
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN View Post
Yes I think so, we should accept that peaceful international relations do rely on a balance of power and our possession of nuclear weapons is a part of that balance, else we leave France as the only western European power who holds them. Of course ideally we'd live in a nuclear free world but you can never be rid of the technology and the knowledge that gave birth to them, and even if you could convince every present government to give up their weapons - which would not happen anyway - we can never know what the next generation of leaders will do

Yes France
a Nation that would use them
more than us
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:37 PM #4
Nedusa's Avatar
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
Nedusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Default

No .........I think we should adopt the Green Party's defence plans, that is to say we should scrap all Nuclear weapons preferring instead to build a very large hedge that follows the perimeter of the UK
__________________
Nedusa is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:39 PM #5
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedusa View Post
No .........I think we should adopt the Green Party's defence plans, that is to say we should scrap all Nuclear weapons preferring instead to build a very large hedge that follows the perimeter of the UK

That would help the NHS
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:58 PM #6
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post
That would help the NHS
You are most wise Arista - if you mean the New Hedge Society.
kirklancaster is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:46 PM #7
JoshBB's Avatar
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,006

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
JoshBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,006

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedusa View Post
No .........I think we should adopt the Green Party's defence plans, that is to say we should scrap all Nuclear weapons preferring instead to build a very large hedge that follows the perimeter of the UK
i was with you until i detected the sarcasm on the large hedge thing.

my opinion on defence is this:

have what we need for DEFENCE (eg. a sufficient army, whatever the technical stuff is)

nuclear weapons are NOT defence and cannot be justified, they are dangerous not only to other innocent lives but to our own country as well. what if they were to malfunction?

100bn pounds on nuclear weapons is really not justified when we have things like a 8bn nhs gap, also we could use that to reduce the deficit and improve other public services, give some working class people lower taxes. help the starving kids in africa.
JoshBB is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:48 PM #8
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
i was with you until i detected the sarcasm on the large hedge thing.

my opinion on defence is this:

have what we need for DEFENCE (eg. a sufficient army, whatever the technical stuff is)

nuclear weapons are NOT defence and cannot be justified, they are dangerous not only to other innocent lives but to our own country as well. what if they were to malfunction?

100bn pounds on nuclear weapons is really not justified when we have things like a 8bn nhs gap, also we could use that to reduce the deficit and improve other public services, give some working class people lower taxes. help the starving kids in africa.

Why is that our problem?
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 06:28 PM #9
JoshBB's Avatar
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,006

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
JoshBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,006

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post
Why is that our problem?
because they are human beings and we shouldn't stop caring for people just because they were born in a different country and aren't as lucky as us
JoshBB is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 06:32 PM #10
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
because they are human beings and we shouldn't stop caring for people just because they were born in a different country and aren't as lucky as us

Under Corrupt African Leaders



So No Way
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 06:01 PM #11
bots's Avatar
bots bots is offline
self-oscillating
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 53,554

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


bots bots is offline
self-oscillating
bots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 53,554

Favourites:
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
100bn pounds on nuclear weapons is really not justified when we have things like a 8bn nhs gap, also we could use that to reduce the deficit and improve other public services, give some working class people lower taxes. help the starving kids in africa.
A fantastically funded NHS will not be much good when we've been nuked by Iran and North Korea to name but a couple. The reason countries listen to what the UK says is for one reason, and one reason only - we are a nuclear power
bots is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 10:33 PM #12
Nedusa's Avatar
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
Nedusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
i was with you until i detected the sarcasm on the large hedge thing.

my opinion on defence is this:

have what we need for DEFENCE (eg. a sufficient army, whatever the technical stuff is)

nuclear weapons are NOT defence and cannot be justified, they are dangerous not only to other innocent lives but to our own country as well. what if they were to malfunction?

100bn pounds on nuclear weapons is really not justified when we have things like a 8bn nhs gap, also we could use that to reduce the deficit and improve other public services, give some working class people lower taxes. help the starving kids in africa.
Actually this official Green Party defence policy.....
__________________
Nedusa is offline  
Old 25-03-2015, 11:37 AM #13
joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,524

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Zelah
CBB2025: Danny Beard


joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,524

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Zelah
CBB2025: Danny Beard


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
i was with you until i detected the sarcasm on the large hedge thing.

my opinion on defence is this:

have what we need for DEFENCE (eg. a sufficient army, whatever the technical stuff is)

nuclear weapons are NOT defence and cannot be justified, they are dangerous not only to other innocent lives but to our own country as well. what if they were to malfunction?

100bn pounds on nuclear weapons is really not justified when we have things like a 8bn nhs gap, also we could use that to reduce the deficit and improve other public services, give some working class people lower taxes. help the starving kids in africa.

I have to say you talk amazing sense,I love reading your posts,you have a great sensitivity as to issues.

I would myself, prefer to keep Trident, I don't see why it needs to be house in Scotland however if the Scots don't want it there.
had the Scots voted for independence, they should have been able to insist it was moved, take it down to the affluent South, who like all these things on others doorsteps but not their own.

I also think it could be looked at as to whether we need all 4.
Savings on it,even without getting rid of it altogether, could as you point out, help massively in other areas of issues affecting UK citizens.
Really good points from you again JoshBB.

This govt; has done shocking and actually in my view, dangerous things as to our defences with probably more cuts to come too,as you indicate also, that needs addressing too.
joeysteele is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:55 PM #14
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedusa View Post
No .........I think we should adopt the Green Party's defence plans, that is to say we should scrap all Nuclear weapons preferring instead to build a very large hedge that follows the perimeter of the UK
YEW must be joking.
kirklancaster is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:40 PM #15
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Default

i think we should keep them in Ireland as they have space and it would be cheaper
Crimson Dynamo is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:43 PM #16
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
i think we should keep them in Ireland as they have space and it would be cheaper
Northern Ireland could hold them
but it costs so much
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:45 PM #17
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post
Northern Ireland could hold them
but it costs so much
use the south where their are no cities or wifi
Crimson Dynamo is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:47 PM #18
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 187,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
use the south where their are no cities or wifi

Do not Upset the Irish Mods
arista is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:57 PM #19
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
use the south where their are no cities or wifi
What about all the Racecourses?
kirklancaster is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 05:59 PM #20
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 106,203


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post
What about all the Racecourses?
no, give them courses on cooking, pugilism and ploughing

these are useful for their agrarian feudal lifestyle
Crimson Dynamo is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 06:24 PM #21
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

maybe that's why the tories cosy up to hedge fund bosses? we're building a hedge around the UK and they're funding it
__________________

Last edited by Kizzy; 23-03-2015 at 06:25 PM.
Kizzy is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 09:46 PM #22
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,744


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,744


Default

Nukes are going to end human life (and possibly everything bar cockroaches) completely IMO. Dont see why anyone has them...

Last edited by Vicky.; 23-03-2015 at 10:10 PM.
Vicky. is offline  
Old 24-03-2015, 05:10 AM #23
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
Nukes are going to end human life (and possibly everything bar cockroaches) completely IMO. Dont see why anyone has them...
I agree that the entire concept of nuclear weapons is complete insanity, but unfortunately - as Matt says - they exist, and if the 'bad guys' have them, then we too must have them - "A knife is a pretty useless weapon in a gun fight".

Considering all the wars and violence that has ravaged this planet since 1945, when the first nuclear bomb was detonated in New Mexico, it is total stupidity for anyone to claim that; 'The Nuclear Bomb Has Kept The Peace', but for us to 'Unilaterally Disarm' ie; do away with our nuclear defence system without other ALL other countries doing the same, is sheer suicidal folly, and by ALL other countries, I mean our current allies as well as our current enemies, because - as history as taught us - 'today's friends' can often be 'tomorrow's enemies'.

Also as Matt says, even if other countries DID agree to 'Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament', there really is no method which guarantees that they will actually do so, or that even if they do, that they won't at some future time covertly restore their nuclear arsenals.

The thought of certain 'crackpot regimes' having nuclear weapons terrifies me because it is akin to baboons wielding 'AK 47's, and I firmly believe that the very first nuclear warhead launched in hostility will not hail from any of the Western democracies or Russia, but from one of these regimes.

This probability alone is all the justification needed to renew or upgrade our Nuclear DEFENCE Capability whatever the cost in sterling.

Last edited by kirklancaster; 24-03-2015 at 08:54 AM.
kirklancaster is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 10:09 PM #24
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 23-03-2015, 10:52 PM #25
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Have ours gone out of date then?
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
nukes, renew, uk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts