[arista]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Baseball caps? oof chavs!

Peaceful protest and a heavy handed police presence.

It Was Not

[arista]

Copper on the deck

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Chaos

Cant wait for them to try and harm the police and then claim police brutality

Not appropriate in the current climax really is it?

[Jack_]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Its unfortunate that a handful of activists can take away what this protest actually meant. 10,000 mainly peaceful but unhappy students hardly got a mention.

.

[Kizzy]

Isn't that how it is always reported whenever there is civil disobedience?

[Samm]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Not appropriate in the current climax really is it?

.

[arista]

[ Violence Fears Ahead Of London Anonymous March
The Met imposes rigorous restrictions on the planned protest as its organisers tell attendees: "The police are not your friends."]

They were Told to end at 9PM Tonight.



http://news.sky.com/story/1582039/vi...nonymous-march

[Kizzy]

TSG.... Yes be very careful.

[arista]

The Punks set a Fake Fire.





Well Done fella put it out

[arista]

No thanks Punk
I am not that hungry






http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ch-London.html

[kirklancaster]

It is now time to ban these 'Protests'.

The crap that "It is only a handful of trouble causers who hijack a peaceful protest" does not wash I'm afraid. There are far too many 'masked' people and far too many seen to be actively participating in the unlawfulness and grinning and laughing, for this to be true.

These 'protests' are organised by anti-Democratic agitators, attended by the gullible and criminal, waste our Police resources and hard pressed tax-payers money, and threaten our very way of life as well as the lives of police officers and the poor police horses.

How much longer are we going to treat this anarchy with 'kid gloves? Why should we tolerate these violent anarchist attacks on our democracy? There is a lawful process in place in this great country called 'Elections' and it is a system for which citizens of other non-free, non-democratic countries risk life and limb during genuine protest marches to try to achieve.

The Law Courts should get tougher with the sentencing for any of these bastards who are charged and convicted, with stiff prison sentences being mandatory.

We are under threat. A very real and grave threat, and it's time to take off the gloves.

[arista]

Sooner or later
we will be using the Water to sort the Punks out.


Kizzy thinks not. of course.

[Kizzy]

Water cannon are too dangerous, I'm as shocked as the next person they haven't been approved though.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

It is now time to ban these 'Protests'.

The crap that "It is only a handful of trouble causers who hijack a peaceful protest" does not wash I'm afraid. There are far too many 'masked' people and far too many seen to be actively participating in the unlawfulness and grinning and laughing, for this to be true.

These 'protests' are organised by anti-Democratic agitators, attended by the gullible and criminal, waste our Police resources and hard pressed tax-payers money, and threaten our very way of life as well as the lives of police officers and the poor police horses.

How much longer are we going to treat this anarchy with 'kid gloves? Why should we tolerate these violent anarchist attacks on our democracy? There is a lawful process in place in this great country called 'Elections' and it is a system for which citizens of other non-free, non-democratic countries risk life and limb during genuine protest marches to try to achieve.

The Law Courts should get tougher with the sentencing for any of these bastards who are charged and convicted, with stiff prison sentences being mandatory.

We are under threat. A very real and grave threat, and it's time to take off the gloves.

I'm trying to understand what you mean. You clearly understand that rioting is illegal but your first sentence contradicts this. You can't re-ban what is already an illegal act or are you suggesting protests are banned altogether?

[bots]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

It is now time to ban these 'Protests'.

The crap that "It is only a handful of trouble causers who hijack a peaceful protest" does not wash I'm afraid. There are far too many 'masked' people and far too many seen to be actively participating in the unlawfulness and grinning and laughing, for this to be true.

These 'protests' are organised by anti-Democratic agitators, attended by the gullible and criminal, waste our Police resources and hard pressed tax-payers money, and threaten our very way of life as well as the lives of police officers and the poor police horses.

How much longer are we going to treat this anarchy with 'kid gloves? Why should we tolerate these violent anarchist attacks on our democracy? There is a lawful process in place in this great country called 'Elections' and it is a system for which citizens of other non-free, non-democratic countries risk life and limb during genuine protest marches to try to achieve.

The Law Courts should get tougher with the sentencing for any of these bastards who are charged and convicted, with stiff prison sentences being mandatory.

We are under threat. A very real and grave threat, and it's time to take off the gloves.

The problem is not with the protests, but with the people that use it as an excuse to get involved in civil disorder. So, no it is not time to ban the protests, but time to target those that use them for unlawful purposes.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Water cannon are too dangerous, I'm as shocked as the next person they haven't been approved though.

No it will stop the Punks

[kirklancaster]

This forum is sending me insane. I excelled in Grammar School in English Language and Literature, I have GCE's in English, won numerous writing awards, sold short stories and been praised by Channel 4 and the BBC for the quality of my writing and the merit of my three submitted Drama scripts. In addition, I have written Campaign articles for The Labour Party and UKIP, but now no one on here seems to understand what the **** I am saying.

I think it's time I shut up.

[Niamh.]

I don't understand how you expect to post in the debate section of the Forum but not have your opinions challenged, that is what this section of the forum is about after all Kirk

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I don't understand how you expect to post in the debate section of the Forum but not have your opinions challenged, that is what this section of the forum is about after all Kirk

I'm not annoyed Niamh - just frustrated,, and it's not about being challenged, I expect that because I know my views stink sometimes. It's when people claim to not understand what I'm talking about or claim to be struggling to understand the points I'm making - despite the fact that I have stated such points clearly.

I end up re-reading my post for fear that alzheimers is getting me.

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

This forum is sending me insane. I excelled in Grammar School in English Language and Literature, I have GCE's in English, won numerous writing awards, sold short stories and been praised by Channel 4 and the BBC for the quality of my writing and the merit of my three submitted Drama scripts. In addition, I have written Campaign articles for The Labour Party and UKIP, but now no one on here seems to understand what the **** I am saying.

I think it's time I shut up.

What are you trying to say???












just pulling your leg

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I'm not annoyed Niamh - just frustrated,, and it's not about being challenged, I expect that because I know my views stink sometimes. It's when people claim to not understand what I'm talking about or claim to be struggling to understand the points I'm making - despite the fact that I have stated such points clearly.

I end up re-reading my post for fear that alzheimers is getting me.

tbf to DR though I do get why she asked you that question, how can you ban protests that may turn into civil disobedience/riots without banning all protests, or do you think Protests in general should be banned?

[Alf]

They're not protesters, they're scumbag thugs making no point.

[arista]

Originally Posted by wannashag

They're not protesters, they're scumbag thugs making no point.

Bang On Right

[Jay.]

i agree with them on tuition fees, but surely there is a better, more educated, way of dealing with it? this won't do a thing lmao.