[Swan]

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

[Beso]

I still can't believe that these men may face a long long time in jail yet none were held before trial..

Were any off the past cases involving muslim grooming gangs held in prison before trial?

I don't know

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Swan

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

Tell me something, what did Tommy Robinson do to help this case? To help this trial? Tell me.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Swan

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

That's how any half righted thinking person would think...but don't lose your **** about it you might get banned for a day.

[Swan]

Priorities are seriously worrying in this thread, what a state our country is in, and yeah Parm i'm leaving this thread now.

Worrying times!

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Tell me something, what did Tommy Robinson do to help this case? To help this trial? Tell me.

Nothing. ..but it looks like he was allowed to keep doing it again again and again by the authorities so they could come to this conclusion...he ain't stupid.

He still did it....and that should be applauded....blame the authorities if it effects the case.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Swan

Priorities are seriously worrying in this thread, what a state our country is in, and yeah Parm i'm leaving this thread now.

Worrying times!

Don't worry Swan.

Just glide off gracefully and flap those wings another day.

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by Swan

Priorities are seriously worrying

i know right! complaining about gay people existing when theres child grooming in the world, the nerve!

[JoshBB]

Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?? lmao

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Swan

The left view would be different if this wasn't Tommy R.

I don''t give a **** about the man, but seriously?! THESE MEN RAPED CHILDREN.

Its not about defending the men, god no. They deserve anything they get.

Its about Tommys actions potentially letting the men get away with it! And the victims identified also.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Elliot

i know right! complaining about gay people existing when theres child grooming in the world, the nerve!

I did NOT complain about gay people existing, really digging now arent we lol.

Be factual correct before posting about my last thread. Thanks.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Its not about defending the men, god no. They deserve anything they get.

Its about Tommys actions potentially letting the men get away with it! And the victims identified also.

What about the police allowing tommy to do it.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Elliot

i know right! complaining about gay people existing when theres child grooming in the world, the nerve!

Priorities huh

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Swan

Priorities are seriously worrying in this thread, what a state our country is in, and yeah Parm i'm leaving this thread now.

Worrying times!

You can condemn the men on trial and condemn the idiot that nearly got them a mistrial at the same time

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Priorities huh

Remember that place you needed to go to?

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

What about the police allowing tommy to do it.

If the police purposely allowed him to do it, they are wrong too Mind, I am not sure what powers they would actually have to arrest him at the time? IDK. Either way, not opposed to distributing blame for everyone who was a dick in this.

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

You can condemn the men on trial and condemn the idiot that nearly got them a mistrial at the same time

Exactly. Its not either or.

[thesheriff443]

Jail sentence for this but child molesters are being give cautions or nfa’s , no further action.

Lose your head over tommy when you should be losing it over the none existent justice system.

Has any of those police officers that turned a blind eye to child abuse for years because it was Muslim men doing it been sacked or jailed.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Jail sentence for this but child molesters are being give cautions or nfa’s , no further action.

Lose your head over tommy when you should be losing it over the none existent justice system.

Has any of those police officers that turned a blind eye to child abuse for years because it was Muslim men doing it been sacked or jailed.

Maybe Robinson should claim filming outside courthouses is part of his culture?

[Jordan.]

Youtube video

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

If the police purposely allowed him to do it, they are wrong too Mind, I am not sure what powers they would actually have to arrest him at the time? IDK. Either way, not opposed to distributing blame for everyone who was a dick in this.

Exactly. Its not either or.

Well it is the polices job to prevent crime...and someone mentioned he had been warned 3 times previously..

I'm sure banning orders are a thing. They could have been used if his presence could have impacted the trial. ..but no...Let's let him do it 4 times to bury the case and arrest a prominent hate figure..to make the government look good.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Maybe Robinson shoild claim filming outside courthouses is part lf his culture?

It’s politics, British government knew every member of the ira.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Swan

Priorities are seriously worrying in this thread, what a state our country is in, and yeah Parm i'm leaving this thread now.

Worrying times!

Yes, how dare we be happy that someone who broke the law and endangered justice for the victims of horrific sexual abuse is facing the just punishment they deserve!

Consider that the reason you're complaining about this country being in a 'state' is because the law was upheld.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Nothing. ..but it looks like he was allowed to keep doing it again again and again by the authorities so they could come to this conclusion...he ain't stupid.

He still did it....and that should be applauded....blame the authorities if it effects the case.

He should be applauded for risking the anonymity of sexual abuse victims and their justice? The authorities are to blame for upholding the law and for him not taking multiple warnings seriously? Do you not see the logical gymnastics you are trying to do right now? You also seem to be confused as to what warnings are, warnings are not permission to carry on what you were doing before they are... well... warnings... It's purely illogical to blame the police for uploading the law when he had warnings not to do what he CHOSE to do repeatedly.

Will you ever actually hold Tommy Robinson responsible for his own actions or will it always be someone else's fault?

[user104658]

The argument that if the police don't stop someone from committing a crime before they've committed it, then the crime is the fault of the police and not the perpetrator of the crime, takes so much twisting and squirming that its actually hilarious.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Well it is the polices job to prevent crime...and someone mentioned he had been warned 3 times previously..

I'm sure banning orders are a thing. They could have been used if his presence could have impacted the trial. ..but no...Let's let him do it 4 times to bury the case and arrest a prominent hate figure..to make the government look good.

So the police did warn him about it. But he ignored the warnings, and thats the polices fault?

At least the 3 warnings show that it was not some conspiracy to just lock up a hated figure, as it shows there was chance after chance given before prosecution was brought