[Brother Leon]

Originally Posted by Tony1111

I like this method to be honest let's us get rid of the Connor types.

Dunno why anyone would want to get rid of the most entertaining HM from a series, but there you go

[Tony1111]

Originally Posted by Brother Leon

Dunno why anyone would want to get rid of the most entertaining HM from a series, but there you go

I would rather get shot of him given that he threatened sexual abuse on a female housemate and was awarded with half the prize fund.

The vote to evict might still work I am imagining that the viewers are mostly on forums now anyway given the smaller audience we can't say how it will turn out now we have lost 6 million or so viewers!

[rachelricci]

im happy with this

[Vicky.]

Vote to save never worked when there was 2 or 3 housemates up anyway.

For it to be effective there should be 4 or more up (eg stupid quad eviction in bb11 should have been VTS, then we would have had a good final)

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Vote to save never worked when there was 2 or 3 housemates up anyway.

For it to be effective there should be 4 or more up (eg stupid quad eviction in bb11 should have been VTS, then we would have had a good final)

this eggggsactly.

[Withano]

Channel 5 turned it into the person with the most fans wins, now its the person with the most haters loses again and its gonna be boring as hell.

[Jack_]

Fans say they want a vote to save with a minimum of 3 people up (which would solve the reverse vote to evict problem when it's head to head)...what do they give us...vote to evict.

It's time to wheel out this video for the first time this series...

Youtube video

[BigSister]

No Marc I didn't like vote to save either. Im happy about this

[Me. I Am Salman]

Kmt at so many people making baseless arguments
Vote to evict, vote to save, it doesn't matter either way. We can still have a fantastic series

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Salman!

Kmt at so many people making baseless arguments
Vote to evict, vote to save, it doesn't matter either way. We can still have a fantastic series

[cheeky_monkey]

I'm hoping this vote to evict is a lie like when the dark BB eye was a lie! But don't think it will be a lie!

I think it really will be a vote to evict!

If all the entertaining housemates start getting evicted then maybe BB might change it to vote to save?

[Gstar]

If you think about it the hardcore BB fans outweigh the casual/brainless fans so it's possible that we'll have the upper hand this time round as oppose to 2004/5/6. Don't complain when the entertaining housemates get evicted when you don't even vote.

[jackc1806]

VTS when there is 3 people up is 1000000000000x better than VTE

[JohnnyBB]

this is good we can get rid of guys like connor faster.

[JohnnyBB]

Why is there no live feed online?
There will be no 24 hour live feed from the House online. We have decided to focus on the nightly highlights show and on directly engaging with the show's viewers and fans through social media platforms.

Big Brother: Live From The House will return on 5* from 7-9pm Monday to Saturday and from 8-9pm on Sundays. There will also be additional live streaming on Channel 5 following the live evictions.

[Jake.]

Victoria, Chris, Lydia, Rebeckah, Heaven and so on all proving that vote to save doesn't always work

[swinearefine]

Originally Posted by JH95

Victoria, Chris, Lydia, Rebeckah, Heaven and so on all proving that vote to save doesn't always work

Obviously it doesn't always save good housemates, but it does a lot more than vote to evict. And in many instances when good housemates left it was a head-to-head vote so it was actually just a vote to evict.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by JH95

Victoria, Chris, Lydia, Rebeckah, Heaven and so on all proving that vote to save doesn't always work

It doesn't work in head to heads, the morons still have free reign. The majority of fans have been asking for a minimum of three nominees per week to cancel that out for years but instead they've decided to return to the old system which is almost guaranteed to fail on our part every single time.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It doesn't work in head to heads, the morons still have free reign. The majority of fans have been asking for a minimum of three nominees per week to cancel that out for years but instead they've decided to return to the old system which is almost guaranteed to fail on our part every single time.

But this is the thing, the current system is only good for more than two nominees, which is rare. So opting to vote to evict isn't s major difference to the series

I do agree with your suggestion though

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Salman!

But this is the thing, the current system is only good for more than two nominees, which is rare. So opting to vote to evict isn't s major difference to the series

I do agree with your suggestion though

I get what you're trying to say but voting to evict entices voters to get rid of the one they dislike the most and that annoys them the most (which 99% of the time is actually the one that should stay to benefit the show), whereas the principle of vote to save should (it doesn't always as you mentioned, but it does moreso than vote to evict) entice people to save the biggest character

The only way now that we're going to be able to balance this out is if they give us two or three random weeks across the series where everyone is up and it's a vote to save with a double eviction. That way we can at least get a few opportunities to cull the dull, but the chances of them giving us that are slim.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I get what you're trying to say but voting to evict entices voters to get rid of the one they dislike the most and that annoys them the most (which 99% of the time is actually the one that should stay to benefit the show), whereas the principle of vote to save should (it doesn't always as you mentioned, but it does moreso than vote to evict) entice people to save the biggest character

The only way now that we're going to be able to balance this out is if they give us two or three random weeks across the series where everyone is up and it's a vote to save with a double eviction. That way we can at least get a few opportunities to cull the dull, but the chances of them giving us that are slim.

I get your point too, i mean I prefer vote to save as well, but thinking the series will inevitably be terrible is a huge overreaction. There are so many other factors

[Jake.]

Actually not with Lydia, forgot she was up against Deana lol

[MTVN]

Not that bothered really, but then I don't tend to equate being the most hated with objective entertainment

[Samm]

I don't know why people are going No the series is ruined it has not Evan stared yet look at all the things channel 5 have done right so far

1. getting rid of brian
2. Emma willis
3. 2 hour live feed
4. new show
5. The house

I still think BB14 is going to be good

[Black Dagger]

yep bye bb14 and future cbbs