FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#51 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
Quoting the Guardian is like quoting the Daily Mail, to be honest.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |||
|
||||
laura carter stan
|
Oh and we still have to send millions per week after we leave, so it was a poor and misleading argument anyway
Last edited by Greg!; 30-05-2019 at 10:32 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
It's true that the £350m figure doesn't include the rebate that we get back from that figure but iirc we don't get to decide how that rebate is used so we still don't have control over that sum
I do think it was quite dubious to use that number for what it's worth but to try and criminalise it is nonsense unless youre now going to do that in every political campaign ever. The Remain campaign claimed leaving would cost every household £4300 a year for instance which was also based on dodgy economics |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
and it seems like this chap's motives were based on avarice and fame alone
someone on here i think said they sent him money ![]() shocking |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
The fundamental truth is that the UK is a net contributor to the EU. We give them more money than we get back. So the fundamental truth of his statement is correct. The figure he used was a treasury estimate, again, nothing wrong with using that as a figure on that basis. The arithmetic over exact figures is very complicated. If the treasury can't estimate it accurately, who can.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
I agree with this I think, when outright lies are told then yeah, why not hold them accountable. I hope this happens to more lying MPs, of all stripes to..well basically hpefully change the whole 'lying slimy politician' stereotype that seems prevailant
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...I don’t think he could lose though...if he did it would surely mean that no political party ever could form a manifesto in case of an unfulfilled promise or intention..?...it’s an interesting one...
__________________
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#61 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
they are - its what is called the house of commons and the house of lords
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | ||
|
|||
-
|
There's a difference between an unfulfilled pro,ise and a lie, though, which obviously is in the intention. If something just turns out to be unfeasible or inaccurate, or just impractical, that's one thing. If it can be proven that the person KNEW the information they were giving out was false BEFORE they said it, that's a totally different matter.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |||
|
||||
Piss orf.
|
Quote:
Funded by anonymous donations on a fund me page....leaving the door wide open for Russian interference...labour interference and perhaps other leadership candidates interfering.. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
Quote:
worth every penny to see that lying arsehole squirm ![]() but speaking of dodgy donations, how is Nigel doing? He is the one being investigated ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
you have been conned m8te |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
Quote:
![]() not to mention it is none of your business what I do with my money Btw, have you read Siege yet? Your idol, Steve Bannon is a major contributor, on the record. I recommend it ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |||
|
||||
Piss orf.
|
Donations can be made annonomously, the bloke even admitted that that was open to some dodgy dealings....anyone could make the donations..absolutely anyone, and hide behind anninomity.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
Appeal?
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I don’t think this would’ve ever had much chance tbh.
As much as we’d all love for politicians to be 100% honest. I think the consequences of this would have opened the floodgates for more and more court time being used for prosecuting politicians who tell porkies. Which let’s be honest is very often. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | ||
|
|||
Stiff Member
|
He's been sacked for lying twice in his career. Now he is lying again, but the stakes are much higher
Last edited by Twosugars; 07-06-2019 at 01:21 PM. |
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|