[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

How do people KNOW he was a bad dad ? they are just going off what the awful press/media relays to them and because they like Megan are automatically believing her, no one knows, so it's unfair to brand him a terrible dad, no one knows what goes on behind closed doors, if he is called upon to testify,surely he has to do that,its been reported on TV today just after his heart attack HARRY contacted him giving him an earful,is this true ? we don't know,I suppose it depends who you like. I ay just let them get on with it,this is just feeding more media frenzy.

Have the same energy when people are calling Meghan awful things because of the things they see in the press

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Have the same energy when people are calling Meghan awful things because of the things they see in the press

When have I ever said I don't like Megan ? It doesn't mean people don't like her because other things are reported. I just see both sides

[James]

Posts deleted. No more insulting members.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by James

Posts deleted. No more insulting members.

Hi james....can you pm me the deleted posts please.

[jet]

Meghan didn't mind when her friends published cherry picked excerpts of the private letter that made her look good and her father bad. Did she take the magazine to court then - no.
When her father published the letter to put it straight he's vilified and the paper is getting sued.

[Kazanne]

Well it seems not all the US press will leave them alone
https://people.com/royals/prince-har...ampaign=473966

[Liam-]

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

I know. Charles's been flogging his biscuits and **** for ages
But not Meghan

[bots]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

I know. Charles's been flogging his biscuits and **** for ages
But not Meghan

Harry's ginger snaps could be a gold mine

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

Charles and Camila's 'own brand' is the inherited Duchy of Cornwall, which pays for the Royal's working income, eg, Harry is paid nearly 3 million a year - which the Sussex's want to keep, even though they are leaving...
William and Kate's 'brand' raises millions for their charitable causes only. If you know they are making money for themselves with commerical ventures, give details please....

[jet]

The problem is that the Sussexes seem to expect to make a fortune trading off their Royal status, which Royals have never been allowed to do.
Look what happened when Fergie tried it, she was blasted, and she wasn't even a royal anymore, only a divorced one.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

The problem is that the Sussexes seem to expect to make a fortune trading off their Royal status, which Royals have never been allowed to do.
Look what happened when Fergie tried it, she was blasted, and she wasn't even a royal anymore, only a divorced one.

Well you've just answered your own question, Fergie is not a Royal... Harry and Meghan are.

The problem is you thinking you can read their minds.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Well you've just answered your own question, Fergie is not a Royal... Harry and Meghan are.

The problem is you thinking you can read their minds.

What am I reading their minds about?

[Glenn.]

Queen Meghan sure has made an impression

[Glenn.]

An assumption isn’t fact though

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

An assumption isn’t fact though

Stop baiting by pointing out the obvious Glenn.

[Black Dagger]

This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by jet

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

For once, the band madness and the song embarrassment, would be true.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

A nice man that tried to make money on his daughter's engagement by setting up situations with the paparazzi and selling stories on his own daughter.

If this was anybody else's father but Meghan's, I don't believe for a second you would defend them.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

A nice man that tried to make money on his daughter's engagement by setting up situations with the paparazzi and selling stories on his own daughter.

If this was anybody else's father but Meghan's, I don't believe for a second you would defend them.

The poor man was left to cope on his own after the romance hit the headlines with dozens of press camped outside his door and following him around taking unflattering pics of him looking dishevelled and buying some beers.

Then his other daughter sets it up that they get a few pics of him in a more controlled and flattering light and BOOM, Meghan and Harry come down on him like a ton of bricks and Harry apparently read him the riot act.
That was when it all started to go wrong. He should have been shown the respect of being introduced to Harry and given protection from the press. He was given no advice or direction at all.

He refused payment for any other interviews, the papers and media involved made a point of saying so.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by jet

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

How do you know what motivated her? Can you mind read?
And dont start with "respected royal correspondents" bc they can't mind read either.


Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

How do you know what motivated her? Can you mind read?
And dont start with "respected royal correspondents" bc they can't mind read either.


Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.

Official....

[jet]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.

Did you read that in the tabloids? Or are you talking about the one that Prince Charles didn't like? I guess thats why they get inside info and all.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by jet

Did you read that in the tabloids? Or are you talking about the one that Prince Charles didn't like? I guess thats why they get inside info and all.

They get gossip from staff and they get hostile briefings from time to time.
Neither can be considered objective source unless backed up by evidence and corroborated by independent sources.


When Woodward and Bernstein broke the Watergate scandal they sought 3 independent sources of every scrap of info they dared to publish. That's journalism not hack job for clicks or money