[jet]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Sexual innuendos aside, why did the Daily Fail fabricate details in this case? If you don't want controversy then at least report the facts.

Mock, could you explain what you mean by the Mail fabricating details in the court case? Have you a link that refers to this?

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by jet

Mock, could you explain what you mean by the Mail fabricating details in the court case? Have you a link that refers to this?

Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.

Hmmm….didn’t she feed details to her friends to leak?…and as it transpires she was exposed in e-mails of wording the letter to ‘tug at the heartstrings’ if it was made public …manipulative to the core.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.

They published the letter at her fathers request after she had given 4 friends permission to reveal parts of it that painted her father in a bad light with no impartiality to People magazine. What Meghan had told them was out of context (as proven in the court documents). Her father asked the MOS that the letter be published to show the proper context.

Meghan should not have revealed personal conversations and lied while doing so to her unsuspecting friends, who took her words at face value, right?

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by jet

They published the letter at her fathers request after she had given 4 friends permission to reveal parts of it that painted her father in a bad light with no impartiality to People magazine. What Meghan had told them was out of context (as proven in the court documents). Her father asked the MOS that the letter be published to show the proper context.

Meghan should not have revealed personal conversations and lied while doing so to her unsuspecting friends, who took her words at face value, right?

Obviously any wrongdoing from Meghan in this case isn't right, but the DM did lose the case so the Courts have also taken issue with the way they conducted their "investigation."

[thesheriff443]

Harry said, my pregnant wife was suicidal but I was powerless to do anything because at the time I was struggling to find organically farmed salmon

Those where dark days indeed.

[user104658]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

what is this even supposed to mean

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

what is this even supposed to mean

Cockadoodledon't.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Posting another selfie, TS?

[user104658]

Jet you had barely posted for almost a month before this thread... did you smell blue blood in the water or something?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Jet you had barely posted for almost a month before this thread... did you smell blue blood in the water or something?

The stench was unavoidable.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

The stench was unavoidable.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

You, TS, spotting your big crush and running towards her shouting "I LOVE YOU" "I LOVE YOU", don't GOOOOOO!

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by jet

You, TS, spotting your big crush and running towards her shouting "I LOVE YOU" "I LOVE YOU", don't GOOOOOO!

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

You, TS, spotting your big crush and running towards her shouting "I LOVE YOU" "I LOVE YOU", don't GOOOOOO!

"No dat's u dat is, not me!"

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Jet you had barely posted for almost a month before this thread... did you smell blue blood in the water or something?

you could say the same for some others on the thread tbf and Jet posted in the Christmas Advent Calender so I think your dates are off

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Cherie

you could say the same for some others on the thread tbf and Jet posted in the Christmas Advent Calender so I think your dates are off

Exactly....

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

you could say the same for some others on the thread tbf and Jet posted in the Christmas Advent Calender so I think your dates are off

That's why I said "barely posted" and not "you haven't posted". Selective reading/comprehension is becoming a bit of a habit eh Cherie

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

That's why I said "barely posted" and not "you haven't posted". Selective reading/comprehension is becoming a bit of a habit eh Cherie

You are not my boss

[joeysteele]

Just to point out to those jumping in as usual.

I DON'T read the postings of the Mail on here.
Once I see a post quoting the Mail.
I ignore it and bypass it.
In fact there's more whole posts I'll avoid even reading in full.

That's if and when I even look in on these threads due to the nitpicking that takes place on near ALL of them.

I'm not bothered what the Sussexes get up to.
However I'll repeat again so it's clearer.
Anyone, ANYONE that is, or any organisation which takes on any of the UK's gutter trash media and wins will get applauded by me.
That's all I'm posting about these last few posts.
Now I have.
I'll go and avoid the pathetic nitpicking that continues on all these threads now.

I'm not interested in the slightest in the Mail or any other publication's twisting of facts and so called news to suit its own agendas.
No interest at all and I don't read them because I've no interest.
Just so you all know.

[Niamh.]

Think this thread has run it's course now.