Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-01-2022, 01:34 AM #16
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock View Post
Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.
They published the letter at her fathers request after she had given 4 friends permission to reveal parts of it that painted her father in a bad light with no impartiality to People magazine. What Meghan had told them was out of context (as proven in the court documents). Her father asked the MOS that the letter be published to show the proper context.

Meghan should not have revealed personal conversations and lied while doing so to her unsuspecting friends, who took her words at face value, right?
jet is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
case, damages, meghan, privacy, receive, £1


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts