[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Evicting someone is in the task. BB stated Raph & Kieran are no longer in the task

It must be a different part of the task ? they cannot win the money but can still be evicted ................. I think

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

It must be a different part of the task ? they cannot win the money but can still be evicted ................. I think

Gawd, my head hurts with this task

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Gawd, my head hurts with this task

And mine,it doesn't take a lot to confuse me

[Littlegreen]

I think that's ridiculous, I know they can change the rules but come on it makes no bloody sense.

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

I think that's ridiculous, I know they can change the rules but come on it makes no bloody sense.

I agree
If they are put back in the task for eviction. Will they be able to press the buzzer to evict someone but get no money?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ellen

I agree
If they are put back in the task for eviction. Will they be able to press the buzzer to evict someone but get no money?

nah, I doubt it

[OMGLattie]

Will they be allowed to still nominate though. Because if they cant nominate, surely its not fair that they can be nominated.

Or does this just mean they can be evicted at the end by the person that takes the money? (which is still unfair as they dont get a chance to play)

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by OMGLattie

Will they be allowed to still nominate though. Because if they cant nominate, surely its not fair that they can be nominated.

Or does this just mean they can be evicted at the end by the person that takes the money? (which is still unfair as they dont get a chance to play)

Oh I'd say they can nominate still on Thursday, this task ends tomorrow I think so that will be that

[Jordan.]

Why are people so confused by this it's fairly straight forward

[Littlegreen]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Why are people so confused by this it's fairly straight forward

Raph and Kieran have been banished from The Steal. So they are not in a team.

The winning team at the end of the task gets to stand behind a buzzer and win money + evict somebody.

- if Raph and Kieran aren't part of teams winning or losing, should they not also be excluded from the eviction part of the task?

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

Raph and Kieran have been banished from The Steal. So they are not in a team.

The winning team at the end of the task gets to stand behind a buzzer and win money + evict somebody.

- if Raph and Kieran aren't part of teams winning or losing, should they not also be excluded from the eviction part of the task?

They'd probably expect them to be classified as being part of their original teams, or they're expecting no one would evict them (because really, who would? These two got the least amount of votes when the whole house was up and I don't think Kieran ever faced eviction besides then). We'll find out if one of them's evicted and they still don't have Best Bits (even though they'd be shown in their eviction interview, which will be on Friday. But go along with my mockery of how BB doesn't prepare Best Bits for people they think are save like Austin and Sukhvinder)

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

Raph and Kieran have been banished from The Steal. So they are not in a team.

The winning team at the end of the task gets to stand behind a buzzer and win money + evict somebody.

- if Raph and Kieran aren't part of teams winning or losing, should they not also be excluded from the eviction part of the task?

Well no because once a housemate has pressed the button the task and teams are meaningless and everyone is free game them being cut is supposed to be a hindrance not an immunity reward.

[Littlegreen]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Well no because once a housemate has pressed the button the task and teams are meaningless and everyone is free game them being cut is supposed to be a hindrance not an immunity reward.

Which it already was, because they can't win the money.

Like BBSpy put it on Twitter, if they can't fight for the prize they shouldn't be eligible for the forfeit.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

Raph and Kieran have been banished from The Steal. So they are not in a team.

The winning team at the end of the task gets to stand behind a buzzer and win money + evict somebody.

- if Raph and Kieran aren't part of teams winning or losing, should they not also be excluded from the eviction part of the task?

if you follow your logic through, the person who presses the button is the only one left in the task at the end, as no-one else is then eligible to win, meaning the person would need to evict themselves

[Littlegreen]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

if you follow your logic through, the person who presses the button is the only one left in the task at the end, as no-one else is then eligible to win, meaning the person would need to evict themselves

It's all a mess.

It just seems odd to me that they "banish" housemates for one part, but include them in the later part.

[Jordan.]

Well if BBspy said it it's like saying a housemate punished with no being able to nominate should also be given immunity from being nominated.

[Underscore]

Sorry but does Raph not have any other types of outfit lmao

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Underscore

Sorry but does Raph not have any other types of outfit lmao

Raph to shake us all as he leaves the house with the prizefund of a Freddo and £1 in jeans and a long-sleeve shirt?