[jet]

Originally Posted by Swan

People have an opinion of celebs in the public eye, shocking!

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry!

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by jet

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry!

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry!

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!

Except you never reference any of the things you list.

Daily Mail is the limit of your research.

[thesheriff443]

It’s utterly ridiculous to think you need to know someone personally to have an opinion on them.

Because if that where true those saying it, can’t have an opinion on any one or anything they don’t personally know.

The weakest argument in the history of the world.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It’s utterly ridiculous to think you need to know someone personally to have an opinion on them.

Because if that where true those saying it, can’t have an opinion on any one or anything they don’t personally know.

The weakest argument in the history of the world.

When you purposely misunderstand what's actually been said I can see how you come to that conclusion.

It certainly explains your opinion on H&M also being full of make believe to justify whatever it is you're saying.

[Kizzy]

I haven't made any presumptions as to their motives for any actions have I?...
All I highlighted is the reluctance to believe bad press about some people but swallow every word about others, that astounds me .
Have an opinion, that's not a problem, it's when entire imagined scenarios are played out as actual events it gets a tad worrying.

[bots]

no one person ever controls the narrative, if people want to debate things that others feel are trivial, that is their right. No-one decides what is worth discussion and what is not

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

no one person ever controls the narrative, if people want to debate things that others feel are trivial, that is their right. No-one decides what is worth discussion and what is not

..on the ‘guest viewing’ bit...I’ve often seen guests viewing threads like ‘on bit in the slide tonight’...etc...I see you controlled those threads quite nicely...

Spoiler:

...obviously might have been bit on the side, though...but hmmmm...:suspectsmiley:....

[thesheriff443]

People are more than happy to hear opinions if it’s the same as theirs just remember it’s a big brother forum not the United Nations

[Christmas Dynasnow]

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pay back Sovereign Grant money, as they seek to remove 'public interest' in their new lives

-----------------------------------------

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £112m Netflix deal 'could include a documentary on Princess Diana

-----------------------------------------

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pay back Sovereign Grant money, as they seek to remove 'public interest' in their new lives

-----------------------------------------

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £112m Netflix deal 'could include a documentary on Princess Diana

-----------------------------------------

Receipts please....

[Father Chris Mouse]

Why are they any different to anyone else in the public eye though? Being critical of public figures is a perfectly natural human trait. We form judgements on what we see/read. They are certainly not being singled out, like some people would have you believe.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Swan

Why are they any different to anyone else in the public eye though? Being critical of public figures is a perfectly natural human trait. We form judgements on what we see/read. They are certainly not being singled out, like some people would have you believe.

That's fine. But making out someone's invented perception of a person's life behind closed doors is factual based on articles in the Daily Mail is laughable. That is the type of thing I am referring to.

The people who talk about "Poor Harry" who doesn't realise Meghan doesn't love him and makes no decisions of his own. An observation anybody who doesn't know them personally could not possibly make.

[Father Chris Mouse]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

That's fine. But making out someone's invented perception of a person's life behind closed doors is factual based on articles in the Daily Mail is laughable. That is the type of thing I am referring to.

The people who talk about "Poor Harry" who doesn't realise Meghan doesn't love him and makes no decisions of his own. An observation anybody who doesn't know them personally could not possibly make.

Are people saying that though? I mean they look as in love as any other celeb couple in the press. Harry is used to a highly privileged way of living, it's not like he's using these private jets and so on because of her, he'd always use them. Im against them because of their blatant hypocrisy. I have no actual hatred for them i just simply don't really like them from what i've seen/read.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Swan

Are people saying that though? I

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

[Father Chris Mouse]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

But it's not like women wouldn't be queuing up for him, he's a wealthy Prince, he'll never be stuck for takers. I think they're both as bad as each other. However, i don't buy the 'poor harry' argument.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

Is that the royal we?

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Omg

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Omg

Royal POLL: Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry’s royal titles over Netflix deal?

MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry made a bombshell announcement this week they had signed a multi-year deal with Netflix to make a range of programmes for the streaming giant, which has sparked renewed calls for the couple to stop using their Duke and Duchess titles while pursuing commercial ventures. Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry's royal titles over Netflix deal? Vote in Express.co.uk's poll.
By RACHEL RUSSELL

Our exclusive poll found a staggering 96 percent (9,335 people) thought the couple should be stripped of their Duke and Duchess titles as a result of their newly-signed agreement with the streaming giant.

Just four percent (408 people) thought Meghan and Harry deserved to keep their titles even though they were pursuing commercial ventures while 76 people said they didn't know.

A total of 9,819 readers took part in the online survey which ran between 3pm and 9pm on Saturday.

[Parmy]

Kings and queens of making the beckhams look normal.

[Parmy]

It was paid into the sovereign grant.

[Father Chris Mouse]

The Prince and Princess will don't deserve, literally

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]