[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Alf

I'm team Clarkson.

All the luvvie TV personalities came out in outrage against Clarkson so that they can keep their dated jobs on TV panal shows because they wouldn't be able to make it in the real World. None of those same people said anything when Jo Brand wanted to throw acid in Nigel Farage's face.

They're the real bad eggs, not Clarkson.

I mean Clarkson literally punched a Co worker in the face but yeah, great guy................

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve

I mean Clarkson literally punched a Co worker in the face but yeah, great guy................

I thought you liked punching in the face. Arne't you into that cage fighting?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Alf

I thought you liked punching in the face. Arne't you into that cage fighting?

I like a sport with willing participants therefore I like people being assaulted..great logic Alf. No more food for you today now.

[Nicky91]

i massively doubt he is any worse than Matthijs van Nieuwkerk, over here in my nation, whom got recently cancelled due to being condescending to many of his crew from DWDD and also turning violent on some of them off camera (to the point of some requiring help by mental health experts)

thx to this NPO now have to search for a new Top 2000 a Gogo presenter for the end of year top 2000 countdown and music quiz, this show is a very popular traditional every christmas and the new years eve

[bots]

most media outlets employ inexperienced kids these days, i doubt anyone read the article through, viewing it from an editorial perspective. That's just not done these days, it's too expensive

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by SantaslettertoMeghan

most media outlets employ inexperienced kids these days, i doubt anyone read the article through, viewing it from an editorial perspective. That's just not done these days, it's too expensive

mmmm journalism has really suffered because of the internet which is very unfortunate

[Liam-]

Sorry, but someone on a level like Clarkson would most definitely be in contact with the editor, he’s not just any random columnist, it would have definitely been looked over knowing that some people will get that paper specifically for his column, I think it’s a definite insight at how low the bar is for ‘journalism’ for rags like the sun

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Sorry, but someone on a level like Clarkson would most definitely be in contact with the editor, he’s not just any random columnist, it would have definitely been looked over knowing that some people will get that paper specifically for his column, I think it’s a definite insight at how low the bar is for ‘journalism’ for rags like the sun

Maybe so, they probably just think everyone will be OK with it because it's Meghan. Which is really gross. I do hope it's made at least some people think maybe they do have a point about how bad the media have been towards her.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve

Maybe so, they probably just think everyone will be OK with it because it's Meghan. Which is really gross. I do hope it's made at least some people think maybe they do have a point about how bad the media have been towards her.

That's fine and the Sun is a load of crap, but forgetting Clarkson and the Sun, you can easily judge Meghan for what she actually says. She's gone on record saying so much, i have no doubt people have said stuff about her that isn't true, but she's had plenty to say herself on a wide range of topics. I base my dislike of her on her own hypocrisy, her non stop complaining about her "disadvantaged" life. I just find both of them so insulting and condescending.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Father Chris Mouse

That's fine and the Sun is a load of crap, but forgetting Clarkson and the Sun, you can easily judge Meghan for what she actually says. She's gone on record saying so much, i have no doubt people have said stuff about her that isn't true, but she's had plenty to say herself on a wide range of topics. I base my dislike of her on her own hypocrisy, her non stop complaining about her "disadvantaged" life. I just find both of them so insulting and condescending.

I don't think she's ever said her life is disadvantaged, has she? (in a monetary sense) Regardless, even is she has nothing she's said has been bad enough to warrant the real disgusting hatred and vile comments about her

[jet]

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve

I don't think she's ever said her life is disadvantaged, has she? (in a monetary sense) Regardless, even is she has nothing she's said has been bad enough to warrant the real disgusting hatred and vile comments about her

Do you have many examples of these? I have come across very few indeed that could be classed as such. Mostly I read valid opinions about her own behaviour and her own words which she puts out there herself for scrutiny like any other celebrity who is in the spotlight.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Father Chris Mouse

That's fine and the Sun is a load of crap, but forgetting Clarkson and the Sun, you can easily judge Meghan for what she actually says. She's gone on record saying so much, i have no doubt people have said stuff about her that isn't true, but she's had plenty to say herself on a wide range of topics. I base my dislike of her on her own hypocrisy, her non stop complaining about her "disadvantaged" life. I just find both of them so insulting and condescending.

Exactly - and the torrent of proven lies whch she tells truly thinking that just because they have come from her mouth they should automatically be believed. It's bizarre.

[Crimson Dynamo]

maybe meghan should leave public life and come back as Markle Marian and just deny she was ever Meghan Markle?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot

maybe meghan should leave public life and come back as Markle Marian and just deny she was ever Meghan Markle?

Why would she do that?

[Glenn.]

“It’s ok for Meghan to be treated like it because other women in the family have been”

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

“It’s ok for Meghan to be treated like it because other women in the family have been”

Glenn getting it all wrong on purpose as usual. Tiresome stuff.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

Glenn getting it all wrong on purpose as usual. Tiresome stuff.

It’s literally what you’ve just said though. You minimise the hatred towards Meghan because the other women in the family had the same. And worse still you agree with with because you hate her so much.

You obsessively post Daily Mail article after Daily Mail article written to incite more hatred towards her because let’s be honest the Daily Mail hate her and they have a niche of middle aged men and women that drink it all up like they’re dying of thirst. Your very blinkered view on her has been orchestrated by the media.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

It’s literally what you’ve just said though. You minimise the hatred towards Meghan because the other women in the family had the same. And worse still you agree with with because you hate her so much.

You obsessively post Daily Mail article after Daily Mail article written to incite more hatred towards her because let’s be honest the Daily Mail hate her and they have a niche of middle aged men and women that drink it all up like they’re dying of thirst. Your very blinkered view on her has been orchestrated by the media.

It literally isn't....

Here's a tip - don't read the Daily Mail articles if they bother you, they are for those that want them.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

It literally isn't....

Here's a tip - don't read the Daily Mail articles if they bother you, they are for those that want them.

I don’t read them I know they’ll be full of ****. I don’t read tabloids

[arista]

[Chris Packham - 'Jail him!]


No Chris,
Ignore him.

[arista]

[Livia]

One man's opinion. He's entitled to it. Who cares?

In a couple of years no one will remember Markle.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

One man's opinion. He's entitled to it. Who cares?

In a couple of years no one will remember Markle.

It's his "opinion" to state that he wants to see her stripped naked and paraded through town having **** thrown at her?

That's not really an opinion, is it? I know he was exaggerating and that he thought he was being funny (he wasn't "joking", but he did think he was being funny) but I don't think the suggestion of gangs of ruddy faced blokes stripping and humiliating women "for their wrongs" in expressions of their sad, impotent rage should really fall in the realms of "just an opinion".

Drunkenly burped out in a pub it should get an eye-roll and ignored. Published in a national newspaper that's read by the exact sort of people who ould - unironically, and genuinely - like to see the people mentioned tarred and feathered ... it's just horrific.

As a "joke" it works better as a satire of the people who do genuinely get themselves emotional and upset thinking about a random celebrity and a family of dough-faced aristocrats.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

It's his "opinion" to state that he wants to see her stripped naked and paraded through town having **** thrown at her?

That's not really an opinion, is it? I know he was exaggerating and that he thought he was being funny (he wasn't "joking", but he did think he was being funny) but I don't think the suggestion of gangs of ruddy faced blokes stripping and humiliating women "for their wrongs" in expressions of their sad, impotent rage should really fall in the realms of "just an opinion".

Drunkenly burped out in a pub it should get an eye-roll and ignored. Published in a national newspaper that's read by the exact sort of people who ould - unironically, and genuinely - like to see the people mentioned tarred and feathered ... it's just horrific.

As a "joke" it works better as a satire of the people who do genuinely get themselves emotional and upset thinking about a random celebrity and a family of dough-faced aristocrats.

Of course it's an opinion. It's his opinion. What's not an opinion about that opinion?

[Glenn.]

Well the daily fail is of course your preferred choice as it’s all you ever post. I’d say enjoy your hatred filled tabloid but I already know you do. You can’t form an opinion without it. So sad