[arista]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

You should place large images in spoiler tags.

Yes I am Guilty as charged

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Could I ask for resizing images again?

There is a really quick, CSS edit that auto-resizes images to a maximum width and I have NO IDEA why this forum doesn't use it .

JAMES FFS, replace your [img] standard BB code to include this:

img style="max-width: calc(100% - 20px);"

before the src variable...

Or actually, just add max-width: calc(100% - 20px) to the img CSS for the entire site. It would literally take 10 seconds.

Oversized images will automatically scale to the size of the window.

Why TiBB hasn't had this for years I have absolutely no idea.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

There is a really quick, CSS edit that auto-resizes images to a maximum width and I have NO IDEA why this forum doesn't use it .

JAMES FFS, replace your [img] standard BB code to include this:

img style="max-width: calc(100% - 20px);"

before the src variable...

Or actually, just add max-width: calc(100% - 20px) to the img CSS for the entire site. It would literally take 10 seconds.

Oversized images will automatically scale to the size of the window.

Why TiBB hasn't had this for years I have absolutely no idea.

[James]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

There is a really quick, CSS edit that auto-resizes images to a maximum width and I have NO IDEA why this forum doesn't use it .

JAMES FFS, replace your [img] standard BB code to include this:

img style="max-width: calc(100% - 20px);"

before the src variable...

Or actually, just add max-width: calc(100% - 20px) to the img CSS for the entire site. It would literally take 10 seconds.

Oversized images will automatically scale to the size of the window.

Why TiBB hasn't had this for years I have absolutely no idea.

I know about all these options. I think we had something like that before but there is some reason I removed it, maybe because people didn't have the option anymore to post big pictures that could be zoomed in on detail.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by James

I know about all these options. I think we had something like that before but there is some reason I removed it, maybe because people didn't have the option anymore to post big pictures that could be zoomed in on detail.

If you use a CSS resize you can right click the image and view it full size in a new tab .

Depends how long ago you had resizing, pre-2014 it could be a pain to get it working in a simple form that didn't have bugs on some browsers, or involve using actual plug-ins but since the full release of HTML5 it's literally one (short) line of CSS on the main sheet .

[James]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

If you use a CSS resize you can right click the image and view it full size in a new tab .

Depends how long ago you had resizing, pre-2014 it could be a pain to get it working in a simple form that didn't have bugs on some browsers, or involve using actual plug-ins but since the full release of HTML5 it's literally one (short) line of CSS on the main sheet .

I'll have a look at it again sometime. I never saw the problem of just putting a large picture as a link that would open in a new tab, instead of an inline image.

[arista]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jikh...ature=emb_logo

Alan Johnson Labour
Talking Sense

[arista]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pN0zHf_WPc

John McDonnell says Sorry
today on Marr

[arista]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fXeP4oWNSA

One hour LBC Ian with new MP's
in London.

11AM today.

[arista]

Confirmed New Queens Speech on Thursday
Parliament opens on Tuesday

[Calderyon]

Using D'Hondt system:

Vote threshold: 2,0 %

Spoiler:

Conservative (43.87%): 297
Labour (32.32%): 219
Liberal Dems (11.63%): 78
SNP (3.91%): 26
Green (2.63%): 17
Brexit party (2.02%): 13
------------------
DUP (0.77%): Not enough votes
Sinn Fein (0.57%): Not enough votes
Plaid Cymru (0.48%): Not enough votes
Alliance (0.42%): Not enough votes
SDLP (0.37%): Not enough votes
UUP (0.29%): Not enough votes
Yorkshire (0.09%): Not enough votes
Scot Green (0.09%): Not enough votes
Speaker (0.08%): Not enough votes
UKIP (0.07%): Not enough votes
Ashfield I. (0.04%): Not enough votes
Liberal (0.03%): Not enough votes
IGC (0.03%): Not enough votes
Aontu (0.03%): Not enough votes
Monster RL (0.03%): Not enough votes
PBP (0.02%): Not enough votes
BSJ (0.02%): Not enough votes
CP (0.02%): Not enough votes
HWI (0.02%): Not enough votes
SDP (0.01%): Not enough votes
Animal W (0.01%): Not enough votes
NEP (0.01%): Not enough votes
LI (0.01%): Not enough votes
NI Green (0.01%): Not enough votes
ED (0.01%): Not enough votes
Libertarian (0.01%): Not enough votes
MK (0.01%): Not enough votes
POOS (0.01%): Not enough votes
IN (0.00%): Not enough votes
GG (0.00%): Not enough votes
CV (0.00%): Not enough votes
V&P (0.00%): Not enough votes
B&P Party (0.00%): Not enough votes
SP (0.00%): Not enough votes
PCF (0.00%): Not enough votes
Peace (0.00%): Not enough votes
Wycombe I. (0.00%): Not enough votes
JAC (0.00%): Not enough votes
Christian (0.00%): Not enough votes
Renew (0.00%): Not enough votes
Workers R. (0.00%): Not enough votes
BNP (0.00%): Not enough votes
SFP (0.00%): Not enough votes
Womens E. (0.00%): Not enough votes
SLB (0.00%): Not enough votes
CU (0.00%): Not enough votes
Advance (0.00%): Not enough votes
YP (0.00%): Not enough votes
AGS (0.00%): Not enough votes
Yeshua (0.00%): Not enough votes
COTME (0.00%): Not enough votes
SE (0.00%): Not enough votes
Socialist (GB) (0.00%): Not enough votes

[Twosugars]

Wow so many

[user104658]

SNP are banking on the Tories denying a referendum for a certain period of time, it's a level of authoritarianism that's key to securing votes.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

SNP are banking on the Tories denying a referendum for a certain period of time, it's a level of authoritarianism that's key to securing votes.

Sure
but you will not get 2nd IndyRef
thats set in stone

[user104658]

Originally Posted by arista

Sure

but you will not get 2nd IndyRef

thats set in stone

Nonsense. Even if there isn't one under BoJo (and even that is not "set in stone") there is - believe it or not - a future beyond Boris.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

SNP are banking on the Tories denying a referendum for a certain period of time, it's a level of authoritarianism that's key to securing votes.

We're effectively one big country, and keeping it together isn't authoritarianism.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

We're effectively one big country, and keeping it together isn't authoritarianism.

But denying people a choice definitely is.

Honestly, any right wing/tory that's actively against an indyref for Scotland is an utter indefensible hypocrite given that they will bleat on about the importance of democracy when it comes to Brexit but they won't allow Scotland a chance to make their own decision regarding whether THEY want to exit the UK in light of everything.

Democracy is democracy. denying people the right to vote because you fear the result is the antithesis of democracy.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

But denying people a choice definitely is.

Honestly, any right wing/tory that's actively against an indyref for Scotland is an utter indefensible hypocrite given that they will bleat on about the importance of democracy when it comes to Brexit but they won't allow Scotland a chance to make their own decision regarding whether THEY want to exit the UK in light of everything.

Democracy is democracy. denying people the right to vote because you fear the result is the antithesis of democracy.

They've had their choice, and they decided to stay.

Even back then Brexit was on the horizon, I think everyone knew a Brexit ref was coming sooner rather than later, and you don't need tealeaves to know that the UK would vote to leave.

Nothing's come to light which couldn't have been predicted.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They've had their choice, and they decided to stay.

Even back then Brexit was on the horizon, I think everyone knew a Brexit ref was coming sooner rather than later, and you don't need tealeaves to know that the UK would vote to leave.

Nothing's come to light which couldn't have been predicted.

That's simply untrue. Even Farage expected to lose the referendum.
You are rewriting the past but we dont have amnesia Oliver.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They've had their choice, and they decided to stay.

Even back then Brexit was on the horizon, I think everyone knew a Brexit ref was coming sooner rather than later, and you don't need tealeaves to know that the UK would vote to leave.

Nothing's come to light which couldn't have been predicted.

If you applied the same logic to Brexit then the 2016 vote wouldn't have happened.

It's hypocrisy, pure and simple. If the brexiters were in Scotland's position, they'd be demanding another referendum and would be throwing tantrums over it.

You are basically telling a whole country that didn't vote for Brexit or the current government that they have no stay and suffer with the rest of us and you're daring to defend brexit in the same breath like it's something completely different.

Utter hypocrisy.

[arista]

Spoiler:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Youtube video

Look at the girl on his right's eyes literally saying "what is this little twerp on about".

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Youtube video

Look at the girl on his right's eyes literally saying "what is this little twerp on about".

That's Arista's crush you're talking about. He's not a fan of Ash though.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

That's Arista's crush you're talking about. He's not a fan of Ash though.

Ash is a Communist.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Everyone knows that when you start earning and owning you take a keener interest in who is spending your money and so the idealism gets shelved for realism..