[sampvt]

Can someone please show me the transcript where Jim says anything about her dead hubby. He offered a key to a door that Linda opened. Jim didn't say her dead hubby was a thief or even that she hated him for something he did, he simply offered an obscure reason to why she hated him and Linda played the victim and offered all the gory details when all she needed to say was, he is talking crap, I don't hate him for that, I hate him because ???????????????

Don't blame Jim for being a twat when he only provided the key, not the story.

[lostalex]

He told Luisa to ask Linda about the dressing room. He clearly was trying to humiliate Linda by humiliating her dead husband.

What does Linda's dead husband stealing money have to do with Linda and Jim's arguments? NOTHING. Clearly he was just bringing it up to hurt Linda.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by lostalex

He told Luisa to ask Linda about the dressing room. He clearly was trying to humiliate Linda by humiliating her dead husband.

What does Linda's dead husband stealing money have to do with Linda and Jim's arguments? NOTHING. Clearly he was just bringing it up to hurt Linda.

Totally agree ..there is a depth you can sink too, Jim surpassed it last night,and to think Ive voted to keep the twat in on Wednesday

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Totally agree ..there is a depth you can sink too, Jim surpassed it last night,and to think Ive voted to keep the twat in on Wednesday

Oh I'm actually surprised that you've changed your mind and not defended him Chuff. I don't mean that to sound insulting as we're all guilty of making excuses for people we've championed throughout

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Oh I'm actually surprised that you've changed your mind and not defended him Chuff. I don't mean that to sound insulting as we're all guilty of making excuses for people we've championed throughout

What he did last night was undefendable,it takes a lot to reduce me to tears ,esp a tv show, but it did last night, why would anyone want to hurt someone as deep as he hurt Linda ? and to do it on purpose, THEN twist what he said ,as low as a human can get

[jet]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

What he did last night was undefendable,it takes a lot to reduce me to tears ,esp a tv show, but it did last night, why would anyone want to hurt someone as deep as he hurt Linda ? and to do it on purpose, THEN twist what he said ,as low as a human can get

Fair play to you chuff for not being making excuses for him. I'm sure many will respect you for that.

[Niamh.]

Well he did really, the Frank Carsons dressing room was about her dead husband

[lostalex]

Coming from a man who is implicated in much worse crimes (molesting young girls) it's amazing that he is stooping to such tabloid lows against Linda. The implications against HIM in the tabloids is much much worse than anything Linda's dead husband was ever implicated in.

He's such an angry old pathetic man.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Coming from a man who is implicated in much worse crimes (molesting young girls) it's amazing that he is stooping to such tabloid lows against Linda. The implications against HIM in the tabloids is much much worse than anything Linda's dead husband was ever implicated in.

He's such an angry old pathetic man.

The police eventually dismissed the case and Jim was completely exonerated


Any idiot can allege a crime

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Catweazel

The police eventually dismissed the case and Jim was completely exonerated


Any idiot can allege a crime

Catweazle, shhhhhhh, you don't want to burst a bubble. Let them have their day. We all know the truth, lol.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Coming from a man who is implicated in much worse crimes (molesting young girls) it's amazing that he is stooping to such tabloid lows against Linda. The implications against HIM in the tabloids is much much worse than anything Linda's dead husband was ever implicated in.

He's such an angry old pathetic man.

That is not true

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Coming from a man who is implicated in much worse crimes (molesting young girls) it's amazing that he is stooping to such tabloid lows against Linda. The implications against HIM in the tabloids is much much worse than anything Linda's dead husband was ever implicated in.

He's such an angry old pathetic man.

Was'nt Jim found NOT GUILTY of those allegations?Wheras Lindas husband was arrested for stealing Frank Carsons money?

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

Was'nt Jim found NOT GUILTY of those allegations?Wheras Lindas husband was arrested for stealing Frank Carsons money?

Well Jim said he didn't know what the truth was, right? when Linda confronted him, he said he just read it in the tabloids, that was truth enuf for him...

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Well Jim said he didn't know what the truth was, right? when Linda confronted him, he said he just read it in the tabloids, that was truth enuf for him...

Lindas husband was caught on camera stealing the money.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

Lindas husband was caught on camera stealing the money.

that's not what he said when he was confronted. He just alluded to the case, and then said he doesn't know what happened.. "ask linda"... so clearly he was trying to make Linda look bad, just based on speculation he heard in the tabloids...

[jet]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

Was'nt Jim found NOT GUILTY of those allegations?Wheras Lindas husband was arrested for stealing Frank Carsons money?

No, he was not found not guilty. The case was dismissed due to 'insufficient evidence' which is a different thing entirely.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by jet

No, he was not found not guilty. The case was dismissed due to 'insufficient evidence' which is a different thing entirely.

Exactly. Being found "not guilty" is not the same as being found "innocent".

Unfortunately for victims, our legal system has a very high standard, "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" which means for every 1 innocent person being put in jail, there are 1 thousand guilty people going free. Especially in sexual abuse cases, because it's almost impossible to PROVE sexual abuse.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by jet

No, he was not found not guilty. The case was dismissed due to 'insufficient evidence' which is a different thing entirely.

Right so he has never been proven guilty?Which in this country makes him innocent.

[Lister of Smeg]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Coming from a man who is implicated in much worse crimes (molesting young girls) it's amazing that he is stooping to such tabloid lows against Linda. The implications against HIM in the tabloids is much much worse than anything Linda's dead husband was ever implicated in.

He's such an angry old pathetic man.

Jim has been cleared of all the claims made against him

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by parmnion

young girls!! that would be like 6-9 yr olds then yeah?

don't be stupid.

implying that i'm stupid for my opinion is a personal attack, reported. Everyone else around here likes to report me, so i guess i'll start playing the game too.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by lostalex

implying that i'm stupid for my opinion is a personal attack, reported.

I think the implication was that your comment was stupid which is not the same as calling you stupid. Stephen Hawkin can make a stupid comment...

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Catweazel

I think the implication was that your comment was stupid which is not the same as calling you stupid. Stephen Hawkin can make a stupid comment...

no, it was clearly a personal attack.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by lostalex

no, it was clearly a personal attack.

In time, you will heal.

[Crimson Dynamo]

He was merely reminding her that if she wished to get into a real ****storm then she better bring her perfumed umbrella and prepare for a brown tsunami

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Catweazel

He was merely reminding her that if she wished to get into a real ****storm then she better bring her perfumed umbrella and prepare for a brown tsunami

Exactly, she brought it on herself. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Its not like they were all sitting there all lovey dovey and he stood up and announced it, that would be out of order. It was ammo that he used to shut her up and put the gobby cow in her place. Hate the way she immediately turned and made it look as if he was poking at her dead husband. He wasn't. She asked for it.