[Kazanne]

Just been looking at some of the comments regarding the lady who died after being accused of trolling,it's really unbelievably hypocritical of some people to call her a troll when they are posting stuff like this,https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheM...nnControversy/
They are doing exactly what they said she was doing,but on reading some stuff,it seems she just had a different opinion to those who support The MCcanns,How can Sky News and the media call HER a troll,but comments about her are kept quiet? anyone have any thoughts on this?

[Marsh.]

Well said.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Well said.

Martin Brunt
Is a twunt,lol

[Samm]

LOL what where they supposed to say when she died "such a loss of life did so much xxxxx"

So yeah your just trying to make a good point out of the McCann thing

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

LOL what where they supposed to say when she died "such a loss of life did so much xxxxx"

So yeah your just trying to make a good point out of the McCann thing

In English?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

LOL what where they supposed to say when she died "such a loss of life did so much xxxxx"

So yeah your just trying to make a good point out of the McCann thing

Have you even read those comments about her? I guess not

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Have you even read those comments about her? I guess not

The way I see it Kaz; is that, under the maxim; 'Innocent until Proven Guilty', Brenda Leyland's identity should never have been revealed to the public. If she was guilty of any crime she should have been charged, tried and then named if she had been found guilty.

Brenda Leyland may have been obsessive in the volume of tweets she made, but her tweets did not include threats of any kind to the McCanns or their children - unlike tweets by others. Therefore, she cannot be deemed to have been a 'danger' to the McCanns or to the general public, so revealing her identity could not be justified on the basis of being; 'in the public interest'.

I. myself, have changed my stance on the McCanns since reading certain posts on here, following the given 'links', and indulging in further reading on the whole 'McCann' affair. I now believe that;'something' is indeed 'rotten in the state of Denmark.', and have suppressed various emotions as a result.

I have not reacted by 'trolling' the McCann's online, but not everyone reacts to a given stimuli in the same manner, and - as yet - we do not know what Mrs Leyland's state of mind was at the time she carried out this trolling; was she suffering from mental illness? Depression? -- Did she lose a child by miscarriage in her past? Did she want other children but was unable? We just don't know whether she had mitigating circumstances for what she did.

What I do know, is, that this poor woman and her family deserve sympathy, not the vile tirades and inhumane bile which these vile, hypocritical troller's are spewing out online and elsewhere.

Finally, I used to have immense sympathy for the McCann's, especially Kate - and though I am not accusing them of anything - I have just looked at their photos and Brenda Leyland's, and my sympathy is all for Brenda.

I actually don't like looking at Kate McCann any more.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

The way I see it Kaz; is that, under the maxim; 'Innocent until Proven Guilty', Brenda Leyland's identity should never have been revealed to the public. If she was guilty of any crime she should have been charged, tried and then named if she had been found guilty.

Brenda Leyland may have been obsessive in the volume of tweets she made, but her tweets did not include threats of any kind to the McCanns or their children - unlike tweets by others. Therefore, she cannot be deemed to have been a 'danger' to the McCanns or to the general public, so revealing her identity could not be justified on the basis of being; 'in the public interest'.

I. myself, have changed my stance on the McCanns since reading certain posts on here, following the given 'links', and indulging in further reading on the whole 'McCann' affair. I now believe that;'something' is indeed 'rotten in the state of Denmark.', and have suppressed various emotions as a result.

I have not reacted by 'trolling' the McCann's online, but not everyone reacts to a given stimuli in the same manner, and - as yet - we do not know what Mrs Leyland's state of mind was at the time she carried out this trolling; was she suffering from mental illness? Depression? -- Did she lose a child by miscarriage in her past? Did she want other children but was unable? We just don't know whether she had mitigating circumstances for what she did.

What I do know, is, that this poor woman and her family deserve sympathy, not the vile tirades and inhumane bile which these vile, hypocritical troller's are spewing out online and elsewhere.

Finally, I used to have immense sympathy for the McCann's, especially Kate - and though I am not accusing them of anything - I have just looked at their photos and Brenda Leyland's, and my sympathy is all for Brenda.

I actually don't like looking at Kate McCann any more.

Bravo Kirk,

[bots]

The lady who killed herself may have been wrong to tweet, but then as has been said she wasn't directing the tweets at a McCann account, so who then was she trolling? The people subscribed to her twitter? in which case there is a simple fix unwatch or whatever,

Are we saying there is a personal limit on number of tweets someone should post in a given day, if so what is that limit, is it legally enforceable etc etc

Now, Mr Brunt targeted the lady in front of millions of viewers trying to make a sensational story, and what happened, he got it, the lady killed herself. I know who should be facing the police questions.

As to these new twatter posters, well, the net sure does highlight that the world is full of a lot more unpleasant people than I ever thought it did. I find it all disgusting

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The lady who killed herself may have been wrong to tweet, but then as has been said she wasn't directing the tweets at a McCann account, so who then was she trolling? The people subscribed to her twitter? in which case there is a simple fix unwatch or whatever,

Are we saying there is a personal limit on number of tweets someone should post in a given day, if so what is that limit, is it legally enforceable etc etc

Now, Mr Brunt targeted the lady in front of millions of viewers trying to make a sensational story, and what happened, he got it, the lady killed herself. I know who should be facing the police questions.

As to these new twatter posters, well, the net sure does highlight that the world is full of a lot more unpleasant people than I ever thought it did. I find it all disgusting

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

LOL what where they supposed to say when she died "such a loss of life did so much xxxxx"

So yeah your just trying to make a good point out of the McCann thing

What do you mean 'the Mc Cann thing'?

She may have done a lot... is her life now defined by one comment on twitter now.

What happened to freedom of speech?
As I said the other day there are lots of unanswered questions and that is bound to cause conspiracy theories with like minded people rightly or wrongly.

How are her family going to feel as innocents in all this at the online abuse?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What do you mean 'the Mc Cann thing'?

She may have done a lot... is her life now defined by one comment on twitter now.

What happened to freedom of speech?
As I said the other day there are lots of unanswered questions and that is bound to cause conspiracy theories with like minded people rightly or wrongly.

How are her family going to feel as innocents in all this at the online abuse?

There is freedom of speech and there is a vicious campaign of hate. The reporter was right to highlight her

50 tweets a a day about a poor dead girl and her parents?


sickening

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

There is freedom of speech and there is a vicious campaign of hate. The reporter was right to highlight her

50 tweets a a day about a poor dead girl and her parents?


sickening

How do you know she is dead?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What do you mean 'the Mc Cann thing'?

She may have done a lot... is her life now defined by one comment on twitter now.

What happened to freedom of speech?
As I said the other day there are lots of unanswered questions and that is bound to cause conspiracy theories with like minded people rightly or wrongly.

How are her family going to feel as innocents in all this at the online abuse?

It apparently wasn't one comment though, it was loads of comments every day and harassing somebody isn't freedom of speech. She was just a troll and it's hypocritical to defend her for her behavior yet deride other trolls for the same behavior.

They're all trolls, they're all in the wrong.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What do you mean 'the Mc Cann thing'?

She may have done a lot... is her life now defined by one comment on twitter now.

What happened to freedom of speech?
As I said the other day there are lots of unanswered questions and that is bound to cause conspiracy theories with like minded people rightly or wrongly.

How are her family going to feel as innocents in all this at the online abuse?

Fueled in part by Martin Brunt himself.

Youtube video

[Crimson Dynamo]

This year alone she had sent 2,136 tweets and on some days she would send more than 50 messages attacking the McCanns’ behaviour, including their use of public donations and their decision to sue their critics.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3FTCHf2rw


she was obsessed

smh

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

This year alone she had sent 2,136 tweets and on some days she would send more than 50 messages attacking the McCanns’ behaviour, including their use of public donations and their decision to sue their critics.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3FTCHf2rw


she was obsessed

smh

I'm not saying she wasn't ,but those all up in arms about it are hypocrites as this is the sort of thing they are posting smh.Are THEY any better?

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I'm not saying she wasn't ,but those all up in arms about it are hypocrites as this is the sort of thing they are posting smh.Are THEY any better?

'Decent kind folk' .. Baffles me how people can be so hypocritical tbh, it's just disgusting.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I'm not saying she wasn't ,but those all up in arms about it are hypocrites as this is the sort of thing they are posting smh.Are THEY any better?

Yes but have a look at the replies from Tibb to the beheading thread

if you think you are right and think that you will not be challenged people can say and do nasty things

like in Germany 60 years ago...

[Marsh.]

She was clearly not mentally well, hence her then committing suicide.

[Tom4784]

She seemed like an obsessive mess so I've got no sympathy for her, I have sympathy for her family though.

[Niamh.]

Lmao at the last tweet that woman made after all the ones she posted previous to it

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Lmao at the last tweet that woman made after all the ones she posted previous to it

I missed the 'decent kind folk' bit !!! just laughable if it wasn't so tragic.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Just been looking at some of the comments regarding the lady who died after being accused of trolling,it's really unbelievably hypocritical of some people to call her a troll when they are posting stuff like this,https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheM...nnControversy/
They are doing exactly what they said she was doing,but on reading some stuff,it seems she just had a different opinion to those who support The MCcanns,How can Sky News and the media call HER a troll,but comments about her are kept quiet? anyone have any thoughts on this?

No before she Topped herself
she deleted her account.

But the Evil words she said are out there


Brunt had no idea she would kill herslf

[Kazanne]

The McCanns aren't on Twitter so how can they be 'harrassed' ? The lady had a difference of opinion she believed they had something to do with Madelines disappearance,a lot of people do,I hope martin Brunt is knocking on the trolls doors who are writing vile stuff about her,lets have an even playing field,The McCanns got away with negligence and no one can comment,really?