[arista]

About Fecking Time

http://news.sky.com/story/1693053/ch...shed-on-6-july

[Jack_]

Can't wait for no one involved to face any kind of repercussions whatsoever

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Can't wait for no one involved to face any kind of repercussions whatsoever

This

[bots]

Don't forget we will be subject to the Tony Blair smirky, smarmy grin too

[Cherie]

Why did it take him so long

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Why did it take him so long

7 years of legal wrangles?


Having to give warning to each git
Questioned Etc

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

7 years of legal wrangles?


Having to give warning to each git
Questioned Etc

Oh it seems pointless as no lessons will be learned

[arista]

Ch5HD News just reported No Blacked Out
lines.


That will make a change

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by arista

Ch5HD News just reported No Blacked Out
lines.


That will make a change

Suggests its not going to drop too many bombshells then

tbf I'm not surprised its taken so long considering all the legal wrangles etc. and the fact that its going to be four times as long as War and Peace, don't envy the commentators who are going to have to trawl through 3000 odd pages

[arista]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Suggests its not going to drop too many bombshells then

tbf I'm not surprised its taken so long considering all the legal wrangles etc. and the fact that its going to be four times as long as War and Peace, don't envy the commentators who are going to have to trawl through 3000 odd pages

yes maybe the Daily Show USA
will put it in a better way

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by arista

Ch5HD News just reported No Blacked Out
lines.


That will make a change

Why would there be blacked out lines, what would be the point of a public inquiry if the findings were not publicised?

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by arista

Ch5HD News just reported No Blacked Out
lines.

That will make a change

Sensitive information will not be made available to the public domain.

http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/backgr...sensitive.aspx

Those procedures are intended to avoid the release of anything the disclosure of which would, or would be likely to:

(a) cause harm or damage to the public interest, guided by the normal and established principles under which the balance of public interest is determined on grounds of Public Interest Immunity in proceedings in England and Wales, including, but not limited to,
i national security, defence interests or international relations;
ii the economic interests of the United Kingdom or of any part of the United Kingdom;
(b) endanger the life of an individual or otherwise risk serious harm to an individual;

(c) make public commercially sensitive information;

(d) breach the principle of legal professional privilege (LPP);

(e) prejudice, in the case of legal advice (following any voluntary waiver of LPP) rather than material facts, the position of HMG in relation to ongoing legal proceedings;

(f) breach the rules of law which would apply in proceedings in England and Wales under the provisions of Section 17 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000;

(g) breach the rules of law applicable to the disclosure of information by the Security Service, SIS or GCHQ, the third party rule governing non-disclosure of intelligence material or other commitments or understandings governing the release of sensitive information;

(h)breach the Data Protection Act 1998; or
(i)prejudice the course or outcome of any ongoing statutory or criminal inquiry into matters relating to the information proposed for release.

[Shaun]

This'll be a huge letdown.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Shaun

This'll be a huge letdown.

Maybe
not long to go

[joeysteele]

At last, and I also have the feeling like many others, that no major criticism that will require any serious further action against anyone will be forthcoming.