[Yuki Maru Hoshi]

Anyway, from the article... read carefully the following:

The Justice Department inspector general on Thursday castigated former FBI director James B. Comey for his actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation and found that other senior bureau officials showed a “willingness to take official action” to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president.

Horowitz also concluded that there was no evidence that political bias infected Comey’s thinking, even as he criticized individual steps Comey took. The report, for example, called Comey’s July 2016 public recommendation that Clinton not be charged an “extraordinary and insubordinate” move, because Comey did not even tell then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch what he was about to do. But it added, “We found no evidence that Comey’s statement was the result of bias or an effort to influence the election.”

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Maru

Anyway, from the article... read carefully the following:

I can read, re-read, re-read it as carefully as you want, but we're talking about events that have already happened in those quoted bits, and we know with 100% certainty that the FBI did absolutely nothing to stop or prevent the trump campaign.

We also know that hiding trumps investigation from the public whilst holding press conferences about HRC actually helped trump, and the NY FBI were leaking information to the trump campaign to top it off.

You can't keep saying "If this happened, I'd want this" when we've already seen the results play out and know that's what happened.

[Yuki Maru Hoshi]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I can read, re-read, re-read it as carefully as you want, but we're talking about events that have already happened in those quoted bits, and we know with 100% certainty that the FBI did absolutely nothing to stop or prevent the trump campaign.

We also know that hiding trumps investigation from the public whilst holding press conferences about HRC actually helped trump, and the NY FBI were leaking information to the trump campaign to top it off.

You can't keep saying "If this happened, I'd want this" when we've already seen the results play out and know that's what happened.

I am going to let go the last post because I don't understand the previous ones. I posted a newsworthy article and because it is news, I posted it in SD and that was the entire point. However, we're not discussing the article anymore, we keep going off tangent and discussing me.. I guess?.. except I have no idea what we are even talking about anymore as it seems like you are quoting my posts and then talking to yourself. I don't have anything to add, because we keep talking past each other... anyway., there seems to be a fixation on my words as if I'm affected and I think maybe you misunderstand my feeling entirely.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Maru

I am going to let go the last post because I don't understand the previous ones. I posted a newsworthy article and because it is news, I posted it in SD and that was the entire point. However, we're not discussing the article anymore, we keep going off tangent and discussing me.. I guess?.. except I have no idea what we are even talking about anymore as it seems like you are quoting my posts and then talking to yourself. I don't have anything to add, because we keep talking past each other... anyway., there seems to be a fixation on my words as if I'm affected and I think maybe you misunderstand my feeling entirely.

With respect, Maru, that is wide of the mark. I have addressed specific things you've written. If you throw statements out there, then me addressing them rather than the content of an article (which I have already addressed by the way) is absolutely not a fixation on your words, it is how a debate/discussion should work.