[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Withano

So, zero staff at your wall... sounding a bit like a magic wall again.

Hell no, armed guards every 10 meters.

You're the only one bothered about costing.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Hell no, armed guards every 10 meters.

You're the only one bothered about costing.

The republicans have just put a stop to the chip programme which specifically helps poor and disabled children get healthcare, and they've also ended the provision in Obamacare which stopped insurance companies hiking up prices, or just flat out refusing to offer a policy to a person with a pre-existing condition.

As a citizen of any country, where would your funding priorities lie?

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

The republicans have just put a stop to the chip programme which specifically helps poor and disabled children get healthcare, and they've also ended the provision in Obamacare which stopped insurance companies hiking up prices, or just flat out refusing to offer a policy to a person with a pre-existing condition.

As a citizen of any country, where would your funding priorities lie?

With both...and as a leader i am fully expecting trump to better any crap that suspected paedophile on some conspiracy theorists websites,obama could come up with.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by parmnion

With both...and as a leader i am fully expecting trump to better any crap that suspected paedophile on some conspiracy theorists websites,obama could come up with.

Do you think Obama is a pedophile? You do know that he wanted a more progressive single-payer healthcare plan, but he pandered to the right to try and make it bipartisan by actually using what was Bob Dole's old healthcare proposal.

Here's the kicker for you, all of Trumps healthcare proposals have all been scored (by the independent, bipartisan CBO) as kicking tens of millions off healthcare coverage and raising costs. Obamacare was supposed to be the first step towards providing healthcare at a reasonable cost (obama even said it needed to be improved). Before Obamacare, the biggest reason for bankruptcies in the US was healthcare costs.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Do you think Obama is a pedophile? You do know that he wanted a more progressive single-payer healthcare plan, but he pandered to the right to try and make it bipartisan by actually using what was Bob Dole's old healthcare proposal.

Here's the kicker for you, all of Trumps healthcare proposals have all been scored (by the independent, bipartisan CBO) as kicking tens of millions off healthcare coverage and raising costs. Obamacare was supposed to be the first step towards providing healthcare at a reasonable cost (obama even said it needed to be improved). Before Obamacare, the biggest reason for bankruptcies in the US was healthcare costs.

So why dont you just wait and see what trump comes up with

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by parmnion

So why dont you just wait and see what trump comes up with

He's already come up with 2 plans. On the back of republicans shouting "repeal and replace" for the last 7 years of Obama's presidency. I guess maybe you want him to have another 20 years at it, whilst kids and the poor are kicked off healthcare. The truth is he has no idea what he's doing, and the people he has brought in have no interest in providing care to all citizens.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

He's already come up with 2 plans. On the back of republicans shouting "repeal and replace" for the last 7 years of Obama's presidency. I guess maybe you want him to have another 20 years at it, whilst kids and the poor are kicked off healthcare. The truth is he has no idea what he's doing, and the people he has brought in have no interest in providing care to all citizens.

Only in america, huh.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

With both...and as a leader i am fully expecting trump to better any crap that suspected paedophile on some conspiracy theorists websites,obama could come up with.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Hell no, armed guards every 10 meters.

You're the only one bothered about costing.

Who's going to provide this security - The Mexicans? So is the US to pull resources from other law enforcement departments to patrol Donnies wall when it has already been stated that net immigration is down in the US? And something tells me - dont know if you'll agree - this wall will be a target for vandalism.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Who's going to provide this security - The Mexicans? So is the US to pull resources from other law enforcement departments to patrol Donnies wall when it has already been stated that net immigration is down in the US? And something tells me - dont know if you'll agree - this wall will be a target for vandalism.

You lost me mate.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You lost me mate.

Ok then we leave it there. I think the point I make is quite easy to understand but if you are struggling then.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Ok then we leave it there. I think the point I make is quite easy to understand but if you are struggling then.

Oh ok lets discuss vandalism to the wall.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Oh ok lets discuss vandalism to the wall.

We don't have to discuss it, I was stating an opinion. Do you disagree with said opinion then thats OK but I think whatever can be smashed up will be smashed up on a regular basis; I see the wall becoming quite symbolic to both sides but if you disagree that is OK.

So who's providing this astonishing level of security and do you think resources should be pulled from other departments when as has been stated twice Mexicans are going back not coming to America

[Withano]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Hell no, armed guards every 10 meters.

You're the only one bothered about costing.

thats the most stupid idea ever.

[GiRTh]

Ok one more post.

Originally Posted by parmnion

Ive offered the thread to others to debate in....shame you arent willing to debate with willing debators.:

Have to disagree Parmy.

Originally Posted by parmnion

Hell no, armed guards every 10 meters.

You're the only one bothered about costing.

Sorry but it was this post that started the 'debate' and it came from you. Three replies to this so unless you meant this comment as a joke then you were also quite happy to debate. What changed your mind?