| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
It really doesn't. No one is saying this man is not guilty or not deserving of a conviction, the issue is whether his conviction was decided because of the crime or because of his sexuality. If it's the latter, it sets a precedent that could allow for gay people to get sentenced based purely on their sexuality and not their crime.
Again, I'm gonna ask you to answer this question. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Take murder our of the equation if you're struggling to see past that. Do you think it's right to give a gay person a different sentence based purely on their sexuality? |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
And that's the point of this thread. Regardless of the crime, there is evidence to suggest that someone has been sentenced based not on their crime but their sexuality. That is the issue here.
|
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|