[lime]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I like to believe that I am learned and astute enough to know the many flaws that Trump has, but what I am referring to are certain posts which are not only infused with patently-transparent, personal detestation of Trump,but which also 'regurgitate' anti-Trump news and imagery in substantiation when such news and imagery has already been proven to be fake.

At the same time, posts which attack and criticise Corbyn are met with vociferous umbrage, even though such posts contain nothing but proven fact.

In my opinion,of course.

That's aolt of words Kirk but I am struggling to find any of them adressing what I have said?
I am not from the UK nor have I lived there...We where talking about Trump but now you bring Corbyn in to it ??

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by lime

That's aolt of words Kirk but I am struggling to find any of them adressing what I have said?
I am not from the UK nor have I lived there...We where talking about Trump but now you bring Corbyn in to it ??

I have not referred to you, Lime???

I am at a loss as to why you mention me bringing Corbyn in when I feel that it is perfectly clear that I am comparing the hypocrisy in it being acceptable for posts to contain fake news, imagery, and allegations when the subject is Trump, whilst posts which contain nothing but facts are met with aggressive responses when the subject is Corbyn.