[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Well BB should stick to their same rules instead of making up one for 1 person and 1 for another . I can't take them serious , over the years they've done so many ludicrous things let so many people off scot free while other's pay the price .Makes no sense and makes the show a bit of a mockery .

I guess time will tell , seen as BB are being so lenient on him as it's day 1. but it's still unfair that he got away with it twice . I bet he'll say it again then lets see if BB removes him .

Originally Posted by jaxie

I think he should have been ejected from the house because they should be consistent and others have been ejected for similar language. You can't allow one person to say it and stay when you've thrown out another for the same word.

You have to remember that big brother is just a group of producers who don't always make the best decisions and frequently make mistakes. If they were to be bound to consistency it would mean that if they were to handle a situation in the wrong way or act too harshly in one season they would have to stick to handling that specific situation like that every season. Even in lets say, 11 years.

Emily's ejection imo wasn't the best decision for that season but I completely understand it. The show was in the wake of a massive race row and it's image was at stake. You can tell it was a hard decision for them to come too, because of how long it took them to call her to the diary room. Really though at the time there was no choice but to eject her. that however doesn't mean that the same should be done in every instance.