Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway
BIB 1: because according to you that whole study disproved the effectiveness of ECT.
I might as well allow it at this point in light of the weakness of the few responses to my posts you've even come up with but then this is the thread to have these discussions so we might as well spin it out some more. But you could always try and read people's posts instead of ignoring 99.9% of the comments countered against yours and stop assuming I don't have any experience where ECT goes.
BIB 2: nope. I'm suggesting you stop telling people to not reply your comments if they're not made in the way you wanna hear.
|
BIB 1: It was not my intention to prove anything by posting that study, nor did the study in itself claim anything concrete. I asked questions in reference to the study is all.
Should you have first hand experience great, let's hear all about it.
It's rich to pontificate about something you haven't stated any real term knowledge of.
BIB2: I think you'll find it was me that was asked not to comment as my post was not made in a way you wanted to hear initially remember?
I don't have an issue with people replying t my comments as they relate to the thread, it's the character assassination I object to. Getting personally offensive isn't what I expect from a serious debate.