FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
So how will this work? Will they nominate who they like and those people will be up for eviction or will the least nominated be up for eviction like the poll? Or will it only be the poll people up for eviction and the house nominations just create paranoia but aren't actually up for anything?
__________________
In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this. Terry Pratchett “I am thrilled to be alive at time when humanity is pushing against the limits of understanding. Even better, we may eventually discover that there are no limits.” ― Richard Dawkins |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
Last edited by Cherie; 22-10-2018 at 08:31 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Sod orf
|
Who said 3 from the viewer poll was up? I don't remember hearing that, I thought it was just 1 as usual?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
TeamDiegoPooth <3
|
those with the least noms will be up i think, remember it is positive nominations so those with most noms are safe
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..it feels as though it’s a way to get as many nominated as possible for the eviction...
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
I don't know why they don't just put them all up for eviction, its a usual ploy at this stage. The only reason I can think of is that they dont want golden boy to go
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Member
|
I reckon the people with the most positive nominations will be safe from eviction, which would benefit the likes of Brooke, Zoe or Cian who are mostly liked in the house but would score low in the viewers poll.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
It would be funnier if the positive nominations went up for eviction. Tell us who you like and it stabs them in the back!
__________________
In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this. Terry Pratchett “I am thrilled to be alive at time when humanity is pushing against the limits of understanding. Even better, we may eventually discover that there are no limits.” ― Richard Dawkins |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
With positive noms it makes sense to ALL nominate the obvious one (Cameron) and thus only have 1 other nom to give to those you are likely to be competing with.
2 nominations will be enough for those not stuffed by the viewer vote. It's possible 1 may be enough. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
and to Save Lewis of course
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Member
|
Unless the positive nominations give them a pass out of the viewers poll, so even if they are one of the three lowest they’ll be safe, and then the next lowest person will be put up for eviction.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|