[Tom4784]

Killing someone in cold blood with the intention of doing so is very much murder, LT. It's basically the definition of it.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Killing someone in cold blood with the intention of doing so is very much murder, LT. It's basically the definition of it.

their blood would not be cold until after they died. and its not murder in the same way prison is not holding someone against their will etc etc

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

their blood would not be cold until after they died. and its not murder in the same way prison is not holding someone against their will etc etc

Nope, still murder. You can't twist this around LT. What you are endorsing is straight up murder.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Nope, still murder. You can't twist this around LT. What you are endorsing is straight up murder.

if it pleases you so

a bullet in the back of the head and then incineration - quick no fuss and cheap to implement

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

if it pleases you so

a bullet in the back of the head and then incineration - quick no fuss and cheap to implement

Yet still it's murder.

[bots]

We could remove their brains for scientific research and then keep them alive on life support .... win/win

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Yet still it's murder.

It can’t be classed as murder as it is legal in some states of America.

It’s punishment for their crimes if they never purposefully ended someone’s life then they would not be losing their life.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It can’t be classed as murder as it is legal in some states of America.

It’s punishment for their crimes if they never purposefully ended someone’s life then they would not be losing their life.

Including the wrongly convicted, you know, who never purposefully ended someone's life.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It can’t be classed as murder as it is legal in some states of America.

It’s punishment for their crimes if they never purposefully ended someone’s life then they would not be losing their life.

Killing someone and intending to do so is murder in my eyes, it doesn't matter if the backwards states still endorse it or not.

Responding to murder with murder is the ultimate hypocrisy, you can't be morally outraged about murder then endorse doing the same to the murderer, it's foolishness.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

if it pleases you so

a bullet in the back of the head and then incineration - quick no fuss and cheap to implement

Except, it's not cheap and it's not quick.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Except, it's not cheap and it's not quick.

are you referring to the American legal system?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

are you referring to the American legal system?

Are you referring to no legal system and a form of vigilantism?

What about the people wrongly convicted? Them being murdered is ok on the off chance that someone who gets shot is also a murderer themselves?

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Killing someone in cold blood with the intention of doing so is very much murder, LT. It's basically the definition of it.

true, and murderers rotting away in jail is a better punishment for them


also if we take matters into our own hands and kill these criminals ourselves we could end up in jail

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

true, and murderers rotting away in jail is a better punishment for them


also if we take matters into our own hands and kill these criminals ourselves we could end up in jail

what if we kill them and dont tell anyone?