FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: What should be done with Brexit? | ||||||
Leave with no deal (Hard Brexit) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 25.00% | |||
|
||||||
Leave with May's deal |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 20.00% | |||
|
||||||
Revoke Article 50 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 22.50% | |||
|
||||||
Second referendum |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 32.50% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
A second referendum would be a blow to the heart of our parliamentary democracy. It would introduce the principle – elitist to the core – that the legitimacy of a political decision rests upon a judgment about the knowledge that informed it. And it would rely on a dirty plebiscitarianism as a way out of the political impasse in Westminster. Those arguing for a second referendum should be careful what they wish for. Chaos is rarely a harbinger of good outcomes.
• Chris Bickerton teaches politics at Cambridge University https://www.theguardian.com/global/c...y-peoples-vote |
|||
![]() |
|
|