[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

It's education, a parent consents to the education implicitly by sending children to school. You don't have to sign a consent form for children to be taught algebra or Roman history, so you don't have to sign a consent form for sex ed .

As for "enticing", I don't think it works like that, but no I wouldn't advocate them "giving out" condoms to everyone as standard... just that they should be available for people to take freely / discreetly. Like I said the alternative is usually unprotected sex rather than abstaining. Also I'd assume we're talking about 13/14+ year olds here, not young children.

Yeah but don't you have to be 16 to legqally have sex in the uk, so by handing out the condoms to underagers the schools are actually aiding and abetting a possible crime?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yeah but don't you have to be 16 to legqally have sex in the uk, so by handing out the condoms to underagers the schools are actually aiding and abetting a possible crime?

NOt having condoms isn't going to stop them though, they'll just do it anyway with even worse consequences.