[smudgie]

Is this a ruddy joke?
They say they are trying it out etc then fine people who don’t want their faces seen.
I personally have no problem with cctv etc, but I can see why people can and will object.

[arista]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Is this a ruddy joke?
They say they are trying it out etc then fine people who don’t want their faces seen.
I personally have no problem with cctv etc, but I can see why people can and will object.

No its all true
These are new temp cameras
connected to Police vans
that scan for Criminals

He did not want to be on their
database.

On the Full Click program
the Police showed some arrests they did
that day from Photo's that clicked to criminals wanted.




They Tested it in San Francisco
and far to many black men got
wrong data
So it was halted there

[bots]

that's not how facial recognition works. If it is checked against a criminal database, then you need to be in that database for your privacy to be affected.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

that's not how facial recognition works. If it is checked against a criminal database, then you need to be in that database for your privacy to be affected.

To be honest I don't think that matters and it falls under the heading of "if you ain't done nuffink wrong then you ain't got nuffink to worry about".

Seriously dystopian territory, this, in my opinion .

I feel like it would be fair enough in certain places: airports, major transport hubs like central train stations, even big venues like stadiums and theatres... but in the middle of a public street? It's a step too far on its own... let alone physically stopping people for not showing their face to the camera, with literally no other indication that they've done anything wrong.