| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
So we are to believe that all 'Tommys' media is tampered with? And fair play to him in some instances that seems to be the case.
He has in essence exposed that media manipulation of facts, lies and bias exists, that said can anyone hand on heart say Corbyn isn't a victim of that too? In relation to the grooming gangs I have to say I am on his side on this issue... YES! The mad socialist loving Corbyn supporter me. The reason for this is the inaction to tackle the issue over time in the name of community cohesion. That was and is wrong...my opinion on that will never change. Whoever decided on that course of action, or inaction was wrong on every level. That said, I don't feel that he is the innocent and injured party here, as being so vocal about the Koran and focusing all his energies on the Muslims of the UK he does come across if not as racist as prejudiced. He has been elevated by nationalists as a figure that is almost saint like, and his speeches are devoured by a section of the UK that can only be described as racist thugs. This cannot be a coincidence, he appeals to them not the rational moderate voices who are also against the same things he is...why? Giving that speech he comes across as rational and forthright, is a far cry from the tracksuit wearing rabble rouser surrounded by very angry looking bald white men. His speech was good, do I feel his anger is justified? In part yes, do I agree with him or his views no.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|