[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The Daily Mail? Really?

The Daily Mail what? You don't believe the excerpt about Archewell then?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

The Daily Mail what? You don't believe the excerpt about Archewell then?

Do I find tabloids who report gossip based on "sources" truthful? No.

Do I find anything in the article reason enough to slate Harry and Meghan? No.

Trademark applications are very involved. It being returned because they've missed things out is not unusual. Tabloids taking innocuous information and turning it into a series of insulting articles is also not unusual.

But... people latch onto anything to justify irrational hatred. I remember the shocking.... DOG WALKING article.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Do I find tabloids who report gossip based on "sources" truthful? No.

Do I find anything in the article reason enough to slate Harry and Meghan? No.

Trademark applications are very involved. It being returned because they've missed things out is not unusual. Tabloids taking innocuous information and turning it into a series of insulting articles is also not unusual.

But... people latch onto anything to justify irrational hatred. I remember the shocking.... DOG WALKING article.

The reporting of the Archewell foundation app being rejected wasn't gossip, it was factual. Where in the article were they 'slated'?

IMO missing signing the document in particular is pure incompetence. Is no -one advising this pair?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

The reporting of the Archewell foundation app being rejected wasn't gossip, it was factual. Where in the article were they 'slated'?

IMO missing signing the document in particular is pure incompetence. Is no -one advising this pair?

You... were using it to slate them. You... brought it into a discussion thread about Meghan's treatment by the press.

Unless you believed it to be relevant to that you wouldn't have shared it.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You... were using it to slate them. You... brought it into a discussion thread about Meghan's treatment by the press.

Unless you believed it to be relevant to that you wouldn't have shared it.

It shows that the Press often just report facts....and how they didn't point out how incompetent the pair of them were to miss out even the signing of a document supposed to be extemely important to them. They could have made much of that one if they wanted.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

It shows that the Press often just report facts....and how they didn't point out how incompetent the pair of them were to miss out even the signing of a document supposed to be extemely important to them. They could have made much of that one if they wanted.

Like you are now?

Grrr Meghan didn't sign something! GRRR!!!