[Parmy]

Everyone forgets Meghan's twitter posts when her and harry were first going out, dropping hints left right and centre...kiss me sweets for photos and pathetic trashy stuff like that.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Cause it's her dad

A dad that has intentionally sold stories to the press...

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

A dad that has intentionally sold stories to the press...

Unintentionally according to her.. the sources in the book say so.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Unintentionally according to her.. the sources in the book say so.

‘Sources’

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

‘Sources’

Did you dismiss all the diana books and thier sources so easily?

[Glenn.]

Haven’t read any Diana books. Don’t need to read a book to know how intrusive the press were with her.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Haven’t read any Diana books. Don’t need to read a book to know how intrusive the press were with her.

It hardly needed an inside source to tell anyone that about diana.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It hardly needed an inside source to tell anyone that about diana.

Then why did you mention her?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

All I see there is an Instagram post announcing it to the world, nowhere does it say they did that without consulting Lizzie or his father first

strange that Harry's meeting with the Queen where they lost their titles, was held after they posted and not before then The Queen statement afterwards said they would divide their time between Canada and the UK so more lies from them

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Cherie

strange that Harry's meeting with the Queen where they lost their titles, was held after they posted and not before then The Queen statement afterwards said they would divide their time between Canada and the UK so more lies from them

They discussed those things after the announcement yes, that doesn’t mean they found out on Instagram.
Plans change, who knew?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

They discussed those things after the announcement yes, that doesn’t mean they found out on Instagram.
Plans change, who knew?

Lol ...their brand was going to be Sussex Royal, if they had any in-depth discussions prior they would have been aware Liz wouldn’t let them use Royal as part of their brand...they went public to force her hand and it backfired on them

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lol ...their brand was going to be Sussex Royal, if they had any in-depth discussions prior they would have been aware Liz wouldn’t let them use Royal as part of their brand...they went public to force her hand and it backfired on them

Allegedly, per anonymous source, according to.. etc

[jet]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lol ...their brand was going to be Sussex Royal, if they had any in-depth discussions prior they would have been aware Liz wouldn’t let them use Royal as part of their brand...they went public to force her hand and it backfired on them

That is exactly what happened. Even their admirers accept that.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Allegedly, per anonymous source, according to.. etc

Tea

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Allegedly, per anonymous source, according to.. etc

Maybe do a little research, as it’s beginning to look like you just want to argue for the sake of it

https://www.insider.com/meghan-markl...-change-2020-2

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Maybe do a little research, as it’s beginning to look like you just want to argue for the sake of it

https://www.insider.com/meghan-markl...-change-2020-2

That’s a nice informative article, nowhere does it back up your claim that the royal family found out about their plans via Instagram, how does me pointing out that your ‘facts’ aren’t actually facts, mean I’m looking for an argument?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Cause it's her dad

Blood/DNA doesn't give him the right to do what he wants and get away with it. That's not what family is about.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

I don't so these things either, and I'm sick and tired of you insisting I do over and over again. I'm asking you politely to stop misrepresenting me.
Every time you do in future, I'm going to report the post, as I consider it serious baiting, I have many posts of yours to prove it. I'm sure the mods will thank you.
ENOUGH!

You find it baiting when I point out you read tabloids? Every link you provide, of which there are many, are tabloids.

If you don't want to be seen as a tabloid reading Royalist then I'll politely recommend that maybe you choose a link other than Daily Mail?

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Tea

Pot.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Pot.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You find it baiting when I point out you read tabloids? Every link you provide, of which there are many, are tabloids.

If you don't want to be seen as a tabloid reading Royalist then I'll politely recommend that maybe you choose a link other than Daily Mail?

You said:

I can form an opinion on anything. An opinion on someone's words and actions.

What I don't do is "research" tabloids and believe everything I'm told as 100% fact and become literally invested in a celebrity's life who has no impact on my own. I find that pretty concerning.

For the LAST time -

As I’ve explained over and over, I read articles by long time respected royal correspondents and biographers. I like to hear their opinions and perspectives. These are printed in the broadsheets of which I read physical copies bought by my brother.
These articles are then often replicated, verbatim, by the DM etc. That is how the press works.
Sometimes the articles are directly printed in the likes of the DM.
I can’t print these articles online from the broadsheets to post here as they require a subscription which I don’t need, but I can print them from the DM etc.
Sometimes I post an article because I just find it interesting and think others might also.
What you do is use the word ‘tabloid’ over and over and over to taunt me in a derogatory way.

The rest of what you say, like in the example above, over and over and over to taunt me is utter BS, and not even worth commenting on.

I’ve explained for the last time, and if you continue to harass me with more of the same I’ll take it as far as I can to make you quit. If you or then the mods ignore that, then I'll quit, because either way I've had just about enough of your hounding.

[jet]

..... and in addition, there are perfectly good documentarys with perfectly legit official royal correspondents, commentators and biographers giving their honest opinions and perspectives - and they know more than you would like to think...
If you don't read their articles or watch then you can't form a judgement on them.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

That’s a nice informative article, nowhere does it back up your claim that the royal family found out about their plans via Instagram, how does me pointing out that your ‘facts’ aren’t actually facts, mean I’m looking for an argument?

It’s in the first link I posted re the timeline, reported by the BBC...hardly an anonymous source

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

..... and in addition, there are perfectly good documentarys with perfectly legit official royal correspondents, commentators and biographers giving their honest opinions and perspectives - and they know more than you would like to think...
If you don't read their articles or watch then you can't form a judgement on them.

Sure

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

You said:



For the LAST time -

As I’ve explained over and over, I read articles by long time respected royal correspondents and biographers.

Yet continually link to tabloid articles when trying to make a point.

I don't care what you SAY you do, when every time a thread on the Royals appears you SHOW the opposite. I can only comment on what you bring into the thread, which is tabloid gossip.

The rest of your post I'm not addressing because it's utter tosh designed to make yourself a victim and accuse others of bullying. It's childish.

Originally Posted by jet

What you do is use the word ‘tabloid’ over and over and over to taunt me in a derogatory way.

No, I use the word tabloid to label a tabloid when you bring one into the thread as "evidence" of facts, which are nothing but the opinions of a journalist trying to sell papers or "clicks".

If you don't get that then I can't help you.