[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

How is commenting on his DM links getting personal? It's commenting on what he is posting in the thread.

The links get mocked because he rubbishes everyone else's input because apparently he has the "avid interest" and doesn't listen to gossip, he gets the facts. Yet when asked to provide them he responds with "do your own research" or posting DM links or quoting a channel 5 documentary.

These aren't "specialist" research materials, they're tabloid newspapers whose goal is to write/publish the most OTT story to get the sale/click. They quote unnamed sources. Waving them about as though they're the beacon of truth and HE knows who Meghan is (even better than Harry himself apparently) is a joke.

Whereas you haven't commented on the thread topic for about 3 pages, so watch your own posting styles before commenting on that of others.

Really? I rubbish everyone else's input? How ironic!
You rubbish my every input, because you don't like it. I am perfectly entitled to post as many links as I please and have my own opinions but I'm harrassed every time I do.
If you think I believe I 'am the beacon of truth' about Meghan that is your problem, not mine. You sure get riled up big time for someone who pretends they have no real interest in Meghan.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Really? I rubbish everyone else's input? How ironic!
You rubbish my every input, because you don't like it. I am perfectly entitled to post as many links as I please and have my own opinions but I'm harrassed every time I do.
If you think I believe I 'am the beacon of truth' about Meghan that is your problem, not mine. You sure get riled up big time for someone who pretends they have no real interest in Meghan.

Erm, nope. I rubbish your posts in which you express how you know Meghan's mind more than her husband and having nothing more than newspapers to back up this knowledge and accept nothing else because to you they are the facts. Especially as you were so vehement that you didn't read those kinds of newspapers.

When people don't lap up those offerings as the one and only truth you opt to victimise yourself.

A daft strategy that does not work here.

I have also never told you not to post or what to post. It's you that has the problem with others commenting on what you post which begs the question of why post on a public platform.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

At some point, Jet, you may have to accept that some (most, I would guess?) people simply don't put quite as much stock on "royal correspondents" as you do. They're press in a posh frock.

I don't expect them to. No problem at all. But if I like to hear what they have to say and make up my own mind on what I hear, I don't see why that gives anyone the right to harrass and mock....
I would never even have utterd the words 'royal correspondent' ever if my links and posts weren't ruthlessly questioned as if posting on a forum was a matter of life and death.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

At some point, Jet, you may have to accept that some (most, I would guess?) people simply don't put quite as much stock on "royal correspondents" as you do. They're press in a posh frock.

At some point members are going to have to accept that they not going to bully jet off the forum because they can’t accept jets opinion.

And yet they think their own opinion is worth the time it took to write, news flash, it ain’t!.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Erm, nope. I rubbish your posts in which you express how you know Meghan's mind more than her husband and having nothing more than newspapers to back up this knowledge and accept nothing else because to you they are the facts.

When people don't lap up those offerings as the one and only truth you opt to victimise yourself.

A daft strategy that does not work here.

I have also never told you not to post or what to post. It's you that has the problem with others commenting on what you post which begs the question of why post on a public platform.

Could you show me those posts please?

There is a massive difference between commenting and non - stop harrassment.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Could you show me those posts please?

There is a massive difference between commenting and non - stop harrassment.

You find people commenting on the posts you make on a forum harassment?

Please stop with the ridiculousness and the crazy insinuation that you haven't been mocking and derisive in your own replies.

[Glenn.]

I can’t at this turning into a ‘everyone’s bullying jet’ when he spends most of the day slinging mud at two people he doesn’t know and anyone that calls him out on it

[jet]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

At some point members are going to have to accept that they not going to bully jet off the forum because they can’t except jets opinion.

And yet they think their own opinion is worth the time it took to write, news flash, it ain’t!.

Dead right, sheriff. It seems the mods aren't going to bother, so all I can do now is find out how to put people on ignore for the first time ever. I never wanted to do that cos I like a good argument and debate, but I draw the line at smart ass harrassment.
Then I can happily post my DM articles (I have given the reason on this thread why I post them) and my opinions, and they can find someone esle to harrass, cos thats what they are here for, after all.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You find people commenting on the posts you make on a forum harassment?

Please stop with the ridiculousness and the crazy insinuation that you haven't been mocking and derisive in your own replies.

I guess you expect to treat people like you do and they shouldn't bite back eventually.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

I guess you expect to treat people like you do and they shouldn't bite back eventually.

So now you're reversing it again to be me the one who has a problem with people replying to me?

This is a poor attempt at gaslighting Jet.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

At some point members are going to have to accept that they not going to bully jet off the forum because they can’t accept jets opinion.

And yet they think their own opinion is worth the time it took to write, news flash, it ain’t!.

People can't disagree with Jet because it means they want him off the forum?

But I'll tell them their opinion is rubbish..... because?

[jet]

Can someone help me out on how to put people on ignore? I would appreciate it. Thanks!