Quote:
Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper
I agree everyone has access to both sides, but the government haven't provided another side as far as I know. You, bots, and a few others habe said there is another side though, so I think we just want to see what it is. Tabloids overwhelmingly favour and are owned by tories, so there really won't be criticism in there.
You ask why a government would alienate their voters, but they happily destroyed communities with Austerity for a decade and still won this past election, so voters are generally like goldfish when it comes to holding governments to account.
|
It was debated on JV this morning and they said it will be coming from tax payers money ,and if some people are on a low income they may not be able to afford that, this is why I think the government voted against it so far, that is what I meant by the other side ,to me its not as simple as the government want kids to starve, that's just sensationalism in my view , I really don't think they would let any "kids starve" and some kids that do 'starve' come from families that put material things above their kids . The kids that genuinely need help will get it I'm sure.
__________________
RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx
https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo
"If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian"