[Zizu]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You're taking away money from the very poorest, so how will that not make them poorer? I'm pretty sure that they don't have cash reserves they can dip into if they're a bit short one week. Their only options are debt (which they will struggle to pay back), or go without, which brings us back to why are we making the poorest people poorer?

It’s money to feed their kids but in my suggestion the schools would be doing that .. robbing Peter to pay Paul ..

I said it was a big change ..



Maybe a compromise.. schools offer every child breakfast and lunch ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Zizu

It’s money to feed their kids but in my suggestion the schools would be doing that .. robbing Peter to pay Paul ..

I said it was a big change ..



Maybe a compromise.. schools offer every child breakfast and lunch ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah, I didn't mean you were being cruel, it's just always an accepted standard for poor people. They always have to prove they've earned something or can be trusted in a way we never ask of the powerful. We have the money, we are just manipulated a a society to believe a) that we don't and b) we should spend it on the things that align with the government.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Yeah, I didn't mean you were being cruel, it's just always an accepted standard for poor people. They always have to prove they've earned something or can be trusted in a way we never ask of the powerful. We have the money, we are just manipulated a a society to believe a) that we don't and b) we should spend it on the things that align with the government.

True enough...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro