[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by smudgie

It was her Grandfather that started it.
Gone on for a few generations.
Her best friends and ladies in waiting still use the name in private with her.

You are correct.
It goes back long before Prince Philip took it on.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Here's the timeline of events which, in my opinion, make it abundantly clear they didn't give a damn what Her Majesty thought:

May 31: Harry and Meghan buy the website LiliDiana.com.
June 4: Meghan gives birth and the couple immediately purchase LilibetDiana.com.
At some point between June 4 and June 6: Harry claims he speaks to the Queen to seek approval for the use of her pet name.
June 6: The name is announced to the world via press release.
June 9: Palace sources tell the BBC the Queen was NOT asked about naming their daughter Lilibet by Harry and Meghan. She was merely informed.

Now who do you believe?


The act of crass commercialisation that gives the lie to Meghan and Harry's
claim that they asked the Queen's permission to name their daughter after
her

full details here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...bets-name.html

[bots]

Dan Wooten exposes lies has got to be the best one yet

[Crimson Dynamo]

more damning evidence here:

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s decision to buy a 'Lili Diana' website almost a week
before their daughter's birth and 'Lilibet Diana' on the day she arrived indicates they had
'already made up their minds' on the name before speaking to the Queen, a royal expert
claimed today.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art....html#comments

staggering

[Liam-]

Dan Wootton could tell me that grass was green and that water is wet and I still wouldn’t trust a thing the rat said

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Now who do you believe?

Only ever TRS* Sookie Baxter and she says the Queen knew and was over the moon.

*Trusted Royal Source

[Marsh.]

"Timeline of events"

Anyone would think it mattered.

Is it not possible for him to focus on actual news?

Anyone would think this 95 year old Great Grandmother is appalled to have great grandchildren named in her honour.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

"Timeline of events"

Anyone would think it mattered.

Is it not possible for him to focus on actual news?

Anyone would think this 95 year old Great Grandmother is appalled to have great grandchildren named in her honour.

its his job

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

its his job

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol

Salesman of the year when it comes to peddling internet outrage? I mean, of course it’s profitable… internet outrage is big business. It’s unsurprising he’s making good money from it.

“It sells well” means nothing more than that though. It sells. That says absolutely nothing about the quality or accuracy of the content… people like trash that gets their blood pumping, human nature. The FACTS are usually just…mundane.

[Liam-]

Fidget spinners sold well, they didn’t bring anything worthwhile to the world either, just more junk

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Fidget spinners sold well, they didn’t bring anything worthwhile to the world either, just more junk

when fidget spinners are still as popular as ever in 125 years time

get back to me

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Salesman of the year when it comes to peddling internet outrage? I mean, of course it’s profitable… internet outrage is big business. It’s unsurprising he’s making good money from it.

“It sells well” means nothing more than that though. It sells. That says absolutely nothing about the quality or accuracy of the content… people like trash that gets their blood pumping, human nature. The FACTS are usually just…mundane.

and as you admitted yesterday, noone likes trash on this site more than you..

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

and as you admitted yesterday, noone likes trash on this site more than you..

TELLY trash. If he pops onto Too Hot To Handle I’ll be there with bells on.

Watching my telly that is. Not also on the show.

[user104658]

ALSO Nicky likes trash more than me.

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Here's the timeline of events which, in my opinion, make it abundantly clear they didn't give a damn what Her Majesty thought:

May 31: Harry and Meghan buy the website LiliDiana.com.
June 4: Meghan gives birth and the couple immediately purchase LilibetDiana.com.
At some point between June 4 and June 6: Harry claims he speaks to the Queen to seek approval for the use of her pet name.
June 6: The name is announced to the world via press release.
June 9: Palace sources tell the BBC the Queen was NOT asked about naming their daughter Lilibet by Harry and Meghan. She was merely informed.

Now who do you believe?


The act of crass commercialisation that gives the lie to Meghan and Harry's
claim that they asked the Queen's permission to name their daughter after
her

full details here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...bets-name.html

Crass commercialisation and more H&M lies.

Dan relaying accurate information for those that are interested.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

its his job

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol

Aww, is he a family member?

I couldn't give a fook how many figures he earns, he's a sad little man peddling lies and gossip and calling it "work".

Top of his game being part of a mob that causes grief and misery, along with the occasional suicide.

"lol"

[Parmy]

Hes not that little tbf.