[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Zizu

You really think there would have been far fewer deaths with Starmer in charge ?

Do you also think that Labour would have developed and funded such a wonderfully successful vaccine program ?

I’m not so sure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You just have an agenda against Labour in my view.
It wouldn't have been Starmer as PM anyhow as Corbyn was leader in 2019.

You equally too cannot say there wouldn't have been less fatalities under Labour.
No one can know that unless they were in.

However what I do believe as a Labour party member myself and you can dismiss it all you wish to.

I know as a member that we'd have expected any government in this pandemic to speak as one voice with all the other 3 Nations of the UK.
Plus to work with other parties to ensure the maximum of everything was done to save people and ensure staff and patients were protected to the full.

Not create the care home disgrace this government allowed to take place.
Or the PPE chaos.

So actually I'd say deaths would have been possibly high still however we wouldn't I think in my view, be the Country with the 7th highest number of deaths.
Where 6 of the Nation's above us have over double our population at least.
Plus I really feel with better protection actioned immediately, far less unnecessary deaths would have resulted under Labour.
Not have an estimated over 20,000 unnecessary losses of loved ones under this Con government.

You may think that's good record, I certainly don't.

However keep bashing Labour all you wish to.
Blame the opposition who aren't in power and credit the disastrous government which is.
However you CANNOT factually say deaths would have been the same or worse under a Labour PM.
As they've been under this PM and government, and still rising in total now by around 700 weekly.