[arista]

[Defaced: One local has chosen to redact
the name Prince Andrew from
Prince Andrew Crescent in Moygashel]


Yes they should change the name


https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/s...-41341824.html


Was debated on the Long Ch5HD AM Live show.
Emily Carver on the TV panel said
it is wrong to vandalise that street sign.

[arista]

[Prince Andrew Park and Prince Andrew Gardens in south Belfast]



Fella, you need a Ladder for that sign

[Livia]

Prince Andrew hasn't been found guilty of anything. He hasn't even been charged. So what would be the justification for removing his name? Seems a bit
hysterical to me.

[bots]

The queen thought it was appropriate to remove his name from all honary positions that he held. Naming a street after royalty is pretty much the same thing, so why not deface it.

Andrew will never be found guilty in a court of law, he will never face criminal prosecution. That doesn't mean that he is not guilty of crimes

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The queen thought it was appropriate to remove his name from all honary positions that he held. Naming a street after royalty is pretty much the same thing, so why not deface it.

Andrew will never be found guilty in a court of law, he will never face criminal prosecution. That doesn't mean that he is not guilty of crimes

Exactly. If his own mother thinks he's guilty then I think these folks can remove his name from their street

[Livia]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The queen thought it was appropriate to remove his name from all honary positions that he held. Naming a street after royalty is pretty much the same thing, so why not deface it.

Andrew will never be found guilty in a court of law, he will never face criminal prosecution. That doesn't mean that he is not guilty of crimes

We don't say about ordinary people, he hasn't been charged... But that doesn't mean he's not guilty. We are required to assume people are innocent until their guilt is proven.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

Prince Andrew hasn't been found guilty of anything. He hasn't even been charged. So what would be the justification for removing his name? Seems a bit
hysterical to me.

But he has stink following him

[bots]

Originally Posted by Livia

We don't say about ordinary people, he hasn't been charged... But that doesn't mean he's not guilty. We are required to assume people are innocent until their guilt is proven.

he is guilty though livia .... im allowed to think that ... he is guilty as sin in my eyes, that doesnt need a court of law

[arista]

The Council can change the signs

Make it Bill O' Reilly Crescent
for example

[Livia]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

he is guilty though livia .... im allowed to think that ... he is guilty as sin in my eyes, that doesnt need a court of law

I

There has been no evidence presented apart from a photo that may or may not have been altered. You can think he's guilty... Doesn't give anyone the right to vandalise. Otherwise we'll have to accept anyone about whom rumours are circulating, is going to be considered guilty despite being not being charged and not convicted.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Exactly. If his own mother things he's guilty then I think these folks can remove his name from their street

Exactly , and I find it laughable and hypocritical that some still want to defend him .

[Crimson Dynamo]

Change it to King Billy 1690 Drive

[bots]

they could call it Pizza Crescent

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

they could call it Pizza Crescent

Nice name
Brief and Filling

[Crimson Dynamo]

Royal Pia Dough Avenue?

[glib]

I see Savile roads all the time. People really don’t have anything else to do in life do they?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Stephen Merchant lived in Gaylord Avenue as a kid. He hated it as you could imagine!