[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It doesnt sit right with me...

would a nuke landing in london sit well with you? Cause that's on the cards at the moment if we do anything rash

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

would a nuke landing in london sit well with you? Cause that's on the cards at the moment if we do anything rash

It's a risk I think must be taken for the sake of our Ukrainian brethren

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's a risk I think must be taken for the sake of our Ukrainian brethren

how exactly could we help though. How are we going to get troops in there safely for example. If we want to stop russian missile strikes, we would have to take out their launchers in russia, cause thats where the big ones are launched from. Don't you see how quickly it all escalates.

Also, ukranians have home advantage, they know the terrain. Western troops wouldnt have that knowledge, and they are certainly not going to get into street fighting which is where this is all heading

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

how exactly could we help though. How are we going to get troops in there safely for example. If we want to stop russian missile strikes, we would have to take out their launchers in russia, cause thats where the big ones are launched from. Don't you see how quickly it all escalates.

Also, ukranians have home advantage, they know the terrain. Western troops wouldnt have that knowledge, and they are certainly not going to get into street fighting which is where this is all heading

Strike first....from afar..first, and heavily..

It will shut putin down.

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Strike first....from afar..first, and heavily..

It will shut putin down.

it wont shut putin down. How are we going to help ukraine by firing missiles at it

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

it wont shut putin down. How are we going to help ukraine by firing missiles at it

At russia...fire them at russia.

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

At russia...fire them at russia.

and you dont think russia would nuke us in response?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Strike first....from afar..first, and heavily..

It will shut putin down.

The way M.A.D works is that it's impossible to wipe out nuke-firing capability with a first strike, thus ensuring that there can be no winner. It's literally the entire point of Trident; the UK could be wiped off the face of the planet entirely, and we'd still have enough nuclear firepower at sea to destroy whoever did it.

Russia doesn't need a programme like Trident because it's ****ing massive and has active nuclear silos scattered all over the place. Impossible to target them all without there still being plenty left to fire back.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

would a nuke landing in london sit well with you? Cause that's on the cards at the moment if we do anything rash

Have you been at the funny fags?