Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-04-2022, 12:31 PM #1
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Seems like ‘recollections may vary’ is no longer the way forward: senior courtiers have revealed:

Harry’s meeting with the Queen lasted just over 13 minutes (not 40).
Meghan didn’t attend the meeting.
Certain 'business' was discussed (speculation at the moment that it was the Counsellor of State issue.)
Neil Sean/Richard Kay

I guess Harry's version sounds good for the American audience to boost the ‘great connection’ to the Queen for their brand.

……and Harry’s version of a great community in Montecito which welcomed them with open arms is baffling to the residents as they have never seen them or speak to them. Harry is seen occasionally on his bike or walking on the beach but no interactions. (Times Article).
jet is offline  
Old 24-04-2022, 01:16 PM #2
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
Seems like ‘recollections may vary’ is no longer the way forward: senior courtiers have revealed:



Harry’s meeting with the Queen lasted just over 13 minutes (not 40).

Meghan didn’t attend the meeting.

Certain 'business' was discussed (speculation at the moment that it was the Counsellor of State issue.)

Neil Sean/Richard Kay



I guess Harry's version sounds good for the American audience to boost the ‘great connection’ to the Queen for their brand.



……and Harry’s version of a great community in Montecito which welcomed them with open arms is baffling to the residents as they have never seen them or speak to them. Harry is seen occasionally on his bike or walking on the beach but no interactions. (Times Article).
Evidence?
user104658 is offline  
Old 24-04-2022, 01:25 PM #3
Rustic bauble's Avatar
Rustic bauble Rustic bauble is offline
rusticgal
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26,466


Rustic bauble Rustic bauble is offline
rusticgal
Rustic bauble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26,466


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
Seems like ‘recollections may vary’ is no longer the way forward: senior courtiers have revealed:

Harry’s meeting with the Queen lasted just over 13 minutes (not 40).
Meghan didn’t attend the meeting.
Certain 'business' was discussed (speculation at the moment that it was the Counsellor of State issue.)
Neil Sean/Richard Kay

I guess Harry's version sounds good for the American audience to boost the ‘great connection’ to the Queen for their brand.

……and Harry’s version of a great community in Montecito which welcomed them with open arms is baffling to the residents as they have never seen them or speak to them. Harry is seen occasionally on his bike or walking on the beach but no interactions. (Times Article).

Living in denial. Harry and Meghan will continue to put on a front...they will continue to feed the press what they want to be reported in the knowledge that the Royals will not respond....unlike the Residents of Montecito
Its really sad when you have to pretend to be something you are not.
Rustic bauble is offline  
Old 25-04-2022, 12:09 PM #4
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

‘William at 40’, a new book by Robert Jobson. Sheds light on the family pressures that shaped the future King.
This extract is an interesting read about William and Harry’s childhoods - and their naughy antics….

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-William.html

'Papa doesn't embarrass me... Mama does': Prince William was the crutch for a troubled mother while his brother revelled in freedom of being the 'spare'. Now a new book by ROBERT JOBSON sheds light on the family pressures that shaped our future king

The unhappy Diana treated the young William as if he was an adult, and she the child…..

[For William, school was not only fun but a respite from his mother’s increasing tendency to lean on him as an emotional crutch. Later, even Diana privately admitted she went too far in burdening him with her problems.
She had taken to calling William ‘the man in my life’, and he did his best to be supportive — once telling her that he wanted to be a policeman so he could protect her. But he was only ten when his parents officially separated in 1992.

After their divorce was finalised, and William learned that his mother would be stripped of her royal title, he threw his arms around her and exclaimed: ‘Don’t worry, Mummy. I’ll give it back to you one day, when I’m king.’
Even so, he sometimes felt uncomfortable at being appointed her champion. After he went to Eton, she would often ring him there, sometimes crying hysterically down the line….]

jet is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
2022, bank, fourday, holiday, jubilee25, june, platinum, queen


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts