[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Yeah, it's not weird to write the article, it's weird to point out the weirdness....Ok Parmy.

Explain the bit in bold

There is nothing weird about an article that has pictures of the youngest child of the future king and queen.

It shows him as a new born and shows him growing up,

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

There is nothing weird about an article that has pictures of the youngest child of the future king and queen.

It shows him as a new born and shows him growing up,

In your opinion.

[jet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

In your opinion.

But why do you think its weird - you haven't said yet.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by jet

But why do you think its weird - you haven't said yet.

I wasn't criticising you for posting it, my criticism was of the article itself. If you swap out the royal kid for a boy down your or my street, then it instantly becomes apparent why I or anyone else might think it's weird. You don't have to agree with me, and I'm not trying to convince anyone else. Just gave my own opinion.

[jet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I wasn't criticising you for posting it, my criticism was of the article itself. If you swap out the royal kid for a boy down your or my street, then it instantly becomes apparent why I or anyone else might think it's weird. You don't have to agree with me, and I'm not trying to convince anyone else. Just gave my own opinion.

But it's not a boy down the street, he's a Royal, and there are articles in a similar vein for all Royal Princes and Princesses, from the Queen to the present day.
It never crossed my mind that it was weird, I'm pretty sure most wouldn't think so either. But if thats your opinion, then okay...