[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

As if you would need to find an excuse to bring up Harry (or Meghan), your obsession is common knowledge

I don't really have much opinion on something from years ago that has only being brought up now to deflect from the actual topic but I imagine those who felt strongly against it refused to take part? maybe you can scour the daily mail archives for a riveting follow up.

The Charles thing was years ago. You're so unaware or oblivious in several different ways that its quite funny.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by jet

The Charles thing was years ago. You're so unaware or oblivious in several different ways that its quite funny.

I would say boring, but each to their own.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I would say boring, but each to their own.

Stop trying to engage with me and go do something exciting with your life then if you're bored

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

The Charles thing was years ago. You're so unaware or oblivious in several different ways that its quite funny.

"The Charles thing" is CURRENT news as it's only just been made aware to the public. Bad post to be calling someone else obvious in

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

"The Charles thing" is CURRENT news as it's only just been made aware to the public. Bad post to be calling someone else obvious in

It was reported years ago, its being regurgitated again now for some reason
Parmy made us aware of the Harry/Invictus games disgrace. Something doesn't have to be in the press before it can be referred to and an opinion on it given.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

It was reported years ago, its being regurgitated again now for some reason
Parmy made us aware of the Harry/Invictus games disgrace. Something doesn't have to be in the press before it can be referred to and an opinion on it given.

Where/when was it first reported? All current articles imply this is new information that has come to light

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Where/when was it first reported? All current articles imply this is new information that has come to light

Years ago, like I said. I'd heard it all before. I believe it was even in the bio of Charles by Tom Bower. How would they only be finding out now about something that happened 7 - 10 years ago...

[Candy Annie Cane]

Originally Posted by jet

Years ago, like I said. I'd heard it all before. I believe it was even in the bio of Charles by Tom Bower. How would they only be finding out now about something that happened 7 - 10 years ago...

Mmm, that's interesting.

I can't find anything about it online and none of the reports mention it was known before and its odd that no-one has mentioned its already in the public realm.

Wonder why they are rehashing it now if it's well known? Wonder if there is more to come or just a slow news day?

Seems pretty murky to be digging dirt on the guy now, especially as it won't be long till he is King and then they will all be fawning over him

[Cherry Christmas]

It was suggested thar No.10 leaked it again in retaliation for Charles speaking out against the migrants to Rwanda issue